Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-801 Exam - Topic 13 Question 84 Discussion

Which characterstic of distributed class- based weighted fair queueing addresses jitterprevention?
C) It uses a priority queue for voice traffic to avoid jitter.
A) It provides additional granularity by allowing a user to create classes
B) It minimizes jitter by implementing a priority queue for voice traffic
D) It provides additional granularity by allowing a user to define custom class

Cisco 350-801 Exam - Topic 13 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-801 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 13
[All 350-801 Questions]

Which characterstic of distributed class- based weighted fair queueing addresses jitter

prevention?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The following commands are used to configure the codec on a Cisco Unified Border Element to prefer the G.711 ulaw and use G.711 alaw as the next codec:

Code snippet

voice class codec 100

codec preference 1 g711ulaw

codec preference 2 g711alaw

The voice class codec 100 command creates a new voice class with the ID of 100. The codec preference 1 g711ulaw command sets the preference for the G.711 ulaw codec to 1. The codec preference 2 g711alaw command sets the preference for the G.711 alaw codec to 2.


by Fernanda at Aug 25, 2024, 02:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-801 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Buddy
9 months ago
Totally agree with B, voice traffic needs that priority!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
9 months ago
A is interesting, but not really about jitter prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalyn
10 months ago
Wait, does this really prevent jitter? Sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
10 months ago
I think C is basically the same as B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
10 months ago
B is correct, priority queues help with voice traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think it was about prioritizing voice traffic to manage jitter. So, could it be B or C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
11 months ago
I feel like the granularity aspect is important too, but I can't remember if that relates directly to jitter prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about priority queues helping with jitter. Maybe it's C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
11 months ago
I think the answer might be B, since it mentions minimizing jitter for voice traffic, which is really important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is option C. Distributed class-based weighted fair queueing uses a priority queue for voice traffic to avoid jitter, which is a critical requirement for real-time communications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key characteristic that addresses jitter prevention is the use of a priority queue for voice traffic. That should help minimize the jitter experienced by real-time applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'll need to review my notes on the different features of distributed class-based weighted fair queueing to figure out which one is specifically related to jitter prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky question on distributed class-based weighted fair queueing. I'll need to think carefully about the characteristics that address jitter prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
11 months ago
I remember learning about this in class, but I'm drawing a blank on the specifics right now. Gotta focus and think it through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
11 months ago
I think option A looks familiar because it includes both dot1q encapsulation and the rewrite command. But isn't there something about the interface type that could be incorrect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
1 year ago
I'm going with C) - can't go wrong with a good old priority queue for voice traffic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the right answer is something really obscure that none of us would ever guess. Gotta love these tricky certification exams!
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 year ago
D) is interesting, but I'm not sure how that would directly address jitter prevention. B) and C) seem more on point.
upvoted 0 times
Raul
1 year ago
C) It uses a priority queue for voice traffic to avoid jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
1 year ago
B) It minimizes jitter by implementing a priority queue for voice traffic
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
1 year ago
A) It provides additional granularity by allowing a user to create classes
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 year ago
C) It uses a priority queue for voice traffic to avoid jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
1 year ago
B) It minimizes jitter by implementing a priority queue for voice traffic
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
1 year ago
A) It provides additional granularity by allowing a user to create classes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yesenia
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. Custom class definition could indeed help address jitter in distributed class-based weighted fair queueing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D. Custom class definition provides additional granularity to prevent jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
1 year ago
I'm torn between B) and C), but I think C) is more specific about using a priority queue to avoid jitter.
upvoted 0 times
Tasia
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, C) seems more specific about using a priority queue to avoid jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
User 1: I think B) is the answer because it mentions minimizing jitter with a priority queue for voice traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yesenia
1 year ago
I think the answer is B, because priority queue helps minimize jitter for voice traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
B) seems like the best option here. Prioritizing voice traffic is key to preventing jitter.
upvoted 0 times
Franchesca
1 year ago
User 4: Yeah, prioritizing voice traffic with a priority queue is key to preventing jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
1 year ago
User 3: B makes sense, prioritizing voice traffic can definitely address jitter prevention.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, prioritizing voice traffic can help minimize jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
1 year ago
User 1: I think B is the best option. Prioritizing voice traffic is important for preventing jitter.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel