Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 350-701 Exam - Topic 3 Question 95 Discussion

Posted by Lynna on Aug 24, 2024 at 02:25 PM

An engineer must modify an existing remote access VPN using a Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility client solution and a Cisco Secure Firewall. Currently, all the traffic generate by the user Is sent to the VPN tunnel and the engineer must now exclude some servers and access them directly instead. Which element must be modified to achieve this goat?

Suggested Answer: D

To achieve the goal of excluding some servers from the VPN tunnel and accessing them directly, the engineer must modify the group policy that is applied to the remote access VPN users. The group policy contains the settings for split tunneling, which is a feature that allows the VPN client to route some traffic through the VPN tunnel and some traffic directly to the internet. Split tunneling can be configured based on the destination IP address, the application, or the domain name of the traffic. By modifying the group policy, the engineer can specify which servers or networks should be excluded from the VPN tunnel and accessed directly by the VPN client. This can improve the performance and efficiency of the VPN connection, as well as reduce the load on the VPN gateway and the corporate network. However, split tunneling also introduces some security risks, such as exposing the VPN client to internet threats, bypassing the corporate firewall and security policies, and leaking sensitive dat

a. Therefore, the engineer must carefully evaluate the trade-offs and best practices of using split tunneling for remote access VPNs.Reference:=

Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0, Module 3: Secure Connectivity, Lesson 3.1: Implementing and Troubleshooting Remote Access VPN, Topic 3.1.4: Configure and Verify Remote Access VPN, Subtopic 3.1.4.2: Configure and Verify Split Tunneling

VPN Split Tunneling: What It Is & Pros and Cons

Cisco ASA - Enable Split Tunnel for Remote VPN Clients


Get Premium 350-701 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
38 comments · newest first
GA
Gail 11 months ago
Really? I thought encryption domain was the key here.
VI
Vivan 11 months ago
I think group policy could work too, but A seems right.
LO
Louis 11 months ago
Wait, are we sure it's not the routing table?
TI
Tiera 11 months ago
Definitely A, makes the most sense.
SL
Slyvia 12 months ago
Gotta modify the NAT exemption for that!
JO
Joaquin 12 months ago
Group policy might be the key here, but I can't recall if it directly affects traffic routing. I need to think this through more.
BI
Billye 1 year ago
I feel like this question is similar to one we did in class about routing tables. But I’m not convinced that’s the right answer here.
ME
Melita 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about NAT exemption being important for excluding certain traffic.
AR
Art 1 year ago
I think we need to look at the encryption domain to define which traffic goes through the VPN. That sounds familiar from our last practice exam.
JA
Jacquelyne 1 year ago
I'm a little confused on this one. Is it the group policy that controls the VPN traffic? Or is that something else entirely? I'll need to review my notes on Cisco VPN configuration to be sure.
CA
Cassi 1 year ago
Okay, I've got it. The element that needs to be modified is the NAT exemption. That will allow us to exclude the specified servers from the VPN tunnel and access them directly. Feels like a good strategy to me.
JA
Jacquline 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward VPN configuration question. I think the key is to identify the element that controls which traffic gets sent through the VPN tunnel versus directly to the servers.
DE
Detra 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure on this one. Is it the encryption domain that determines what traffic goes through the VPN? Or could it be the routing table? I'll need to think this through carefully.
LI
Lilli 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding that change request types allow you to control the behavior and properties of the change management process. Based on the options, it seems like the correct answer is B - the validation and derivation behavior during runtime.
HO
Hortencia 2 years ago
I'm picturing the engineer right now, scratching their head and muttering, 'Routing table, where art thou?' Just another day in the life of a network admin.
YE
Yen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Hortencia
C) routing table
LE
Lettie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Hortencia
B) encryption domain
GA
Gail 2 years ago
↳ replying to Hortencia
A) NAT exemption
SA
Sabina 2 years ago
NAT exemption? Sounds like a fancy way to say 'let's just ignore the VPN and go straight to the servers.'
RE
Renay 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
No problem! Always happy to help.
ON
Ona 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying!
AM
Ammie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
Yes, NAT exemption is the correct answer. It allows certain traffic to bypass the VPN tunnel and access servers directly.
LE
Lenna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
D) group policy
FA
Fabiola 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
C) routing table
MA
Martha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
B) encryption domain
HE
Helene 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sabina
A) NAT exemption
JO
Joseph 2 years ago
I agree with Cristal, NAT exemption makes the most sense in this scenario.
SH
Shasta 2 years ago
I think it could be D) group policy, as that controls user access permissions.
AI
Aileen 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) routing table that needs to be modified.
MA
Matthew 2 years ago
Hmm, group policy seems like the way to go. Who doesn't love a good policy to keep things in check?
KI
Kimbery 2 years ago
I'd go for the encryption domain. Sounds like the kind of thing that would let us bypass the VPN tunnel.
ZA
Zana 2 years ago
The routing table is definitely the key element to modify here. Gotta love those dynamic routes!
GA
Gail 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zana
D) group policy
AL
Almeta 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zana
The routing table is definitely the key element to modify here. Gotta love those dynamic routes!
LI
Lili 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zana
C) routing table
BU
Bulah 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zana
B) encryption domain
CA
Cassandra 2 years ago
↳ replying to Zana
A) NAT exemption
CR
Cristal 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is A) NAT exemption.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel