Cisco 350-701 Exam - Topic 2 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-701 exam

Question #: 110
Topic #: 2

Which configuration method provides the options to prevent physical and virtual endpoint devices that are in the same base EPG or uSeg from being able to communicate with each other with Vmware VDS or Microsoft vSwitch?

Ainter-EPG isolation

Binter-VLAN security

Cintra-EPG isolation

Dplacement in separate EPGs

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Intra-EPG Isolationis an option to prevent physical or virtual endpoint devices that are in the same base EPG or microsegmented (uSeg) EPG from communicating with each other. By default, endpoint devices included in the same EPG are allowed to communicate with one another.

by Hildred at Apr 29, 2025, 09:17 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-701 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Erin

8 months ago

I thought they could communicate if they're in the same EPG!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mabelle

9 months ago

Wait, are we sure this isn't just inter-VLAN security?

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

9 months ago

I think it's C, intra-EPG isolation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassie

9 months ago

Not so sure about that, could be D too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queenie

9 months ago

Definitely agree with that!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lelia

9 months ago

I’m leaning towards inter-EPG isolation, but I could be mixing it up with something else I studied. This is tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephanie

10 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like placement in separate EPGs could also be a valid option, but it seems more about separation than isolation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcelle

10 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about inter-VLAN security being more about traffic between different VLANs rather than within the same one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raelene

10 months ago

I think intra-EPG isolation might be the right answer since it deals with communication within the same EPG.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

10 months ago

I've seen this type of question before. The key is to focus on the isolation between endpoints, not just the EPG configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Armando

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Let me re-read it and see if I can figure out the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

11 months ago

Intra-EPG isolation sounds like the right choice here. That's the one that prevents communication within the same EPG, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lucina

11 months ago

Okay, I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

11 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corrinne

1 year ago

A) inter-EPG isolation? What is this, a free-for-all? You gotta keep those endpoints in check, and C) intra-EPG isolation is the way to do it. It's like building a virtual fence around your virtual pets.

upvoted 0 times

Izetta

1 year ago

D) It's like building a virtual fence around your virtual pets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

1 year ago

C) Intra-EPG isolation is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

1 year ago

B) No way, you gotta keep those endpoints in check.

upvoted 0 times

...

Callie

1 year ago

A) inter-EPG isolation? What is this, a free-for-all?

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) intra-EPG isolation could also be a valid option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

1 year ago

B) inter-VLAN security? Really? That's like trying to keep the cat out of the bird cage by locking the front door. C) intra-EPG isolation is the way to go, hands down.

upvoted 0 times

Rebbecca

1 year ago

A) It's important to use the right configuration method to ensure proper security measures are in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

1 year ago

B) I agree, intra-EPG isolation is much more effective in controlling communication between endpoint devices.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

1 year ago

A) You're right, inter-VLAN security is not enough to prevent communication between devices in the same EPG or uSeg.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emerson

1 year ago

C) intra-EPG isolation, of course! How else are you going to keep those pesky virtual endpoints from talking to each other? It's like putting your siblings in separate rooms to avoid a fight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

1 year ago

I agree with Melvin, because inter-EPG isolation prevents communication between devices in the same base EPG.

upvoted 0 times

...

Misty

1 year ago

D) placement in separate EPGs sounds like the right approach to me. Isolating devices in different EPGs is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Georgene

1 year ago

I agree, isolating devices in different EPGs is the way to go for preventing communication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

1 year ago

Yes, placing them in separate EPGs is the best way to prevent communication between them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

1 year ago

I think the answer is A) inter-EPG isolation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlena

1 year ago

I'm pretty sure the answer is C) intra-EPG isolation. It makes the most sense to prevent communication within the same EPG.

upvoted 0 times

Chara

1 year ago

Absolutely, it helps to control the flow of traffic and prevent any unauthorized communication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanna

1 year ago

That's good to know. It's important to have that level of isolation to enhance security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleta

1 year ago

Yes, you are correct. Intra-EPG isolation is the method to prevent communication within the same EPG.

upvoted 0 times

...