MENU
Which configuration method provides the options to prevent physical and virtual endpoint devices that are in the same base EPG or uSeg from being able to communicate with each other with Vmware VDS or Microsoft vSwitch?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 350-701 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Intra-EPG Isolationis an option to prevent physical or virtual endpoint devices that are in the same base EPG or microsegmented (uSeg) EPG from communicating with each other. By default, endpoint devices included in the same EPG are allowed to communicate with one another.
34 comments · newest first
ER
Erin
10 months ago
I thought they could communicate if they're in the same EPG!
MA
Mabelle
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure this isn't just inter-VLAN security?
ER
Erinn
10 months ago
I think it's C, intra-EPG isolation.
CA
Cassie
11 months ago
Not so sure about that, could be D too.
QU
Queenie
11 months ago
Definitely agree with that!
LE
Lelia
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards inter-EPG isolation, but I could be mixing it up with something else I studied. This is tricky!
ST
Stephanie
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like placement in separate EPGs could also be a valid option, but it seems more about separation than isolation.
MA
Marcelle
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about inter-VLAN security being more about traffic between different VLANs rather than within the same one.
RA
Raelene
12 months ago
I think intra-EPG isolation might be the right answer since it deals with communication within the same EPG.
ER
Erick
12 months ago
I've seen this type of question before. The key is to focus on the isolation between endpoints, not just the EPG configuration.
AR
Armando
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Let me re-read it and see if I can figure out the best approach.
LA
Lauran
1 year ago
Intra-EPG isolation sounds like the right choice here. That's the one that prevents communication within the same EPG, right?
LU
Lucina
1 year ago
Okay, I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting it.
AD
Adolph
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the differences between the options.
CO
Corrinne
1 year ago
A) inter-EPG isolation? What is this, a free-for-all? You gotta keep those endpoints in check, and C) intra-EPG isolation is the way to do it. It's like building a virtual fence around your virtual pets.
IZ
Izetta
1 year ago
D) It's like building a virtual fence around your virtual pets.
BR
Brock
1 year ago
C) Intra-EPG isolation is the way to go.
IL
Ilene
1 year ago
B) No way, you gotta keep those endpoints in check.
CA
Callie
1 year ago
A) inter-EPG isolation? What is this, a free-for-all?
GL
Glendora
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) intra-EPG isolation could also be a valid option.
CA
Carin
1 year ago
B) inter-VLAN security? Really? That's like trying to keep the cat out of the bird cage by locking the front door. C) intra-EPG isolation is the way to go, hands down.
RE
Rebbecca
1 year ago
A) It's important to use the right configuration method to ensure proper security measures are in place.
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
B) I agree, intra-EPG isolation is much more effective in controlling communication between endpoint devices.
AL
Allene
1 year ago
A) You're right, inter-VLAN security is not enough to prevent communication between devices in the same EPG or uSeg.
EM
Emerson
1 year ago
C) intra-EPG isolation, of course! How else are you going to keep those pesky virtual endpoints from talking to each other? It's like putting your siblings in separate rooms to avoid a fight.
VA
Valentine
1 year ago
I agree with Melvin, because inter-EPG isolation prevents communication between devices in the same base EPG.
MI
Misty
1 year ago
D) placement in separate EPGs sounds like the right approach to me. Isolating devices in different EPGs is the way to go.
GE
Georgene
1 year ago
I agree, isolating devices in different EPGs is the way to go for preventing communication.
FL
Florinda
1 year ago
Yes, placing them in separate EPGs is the best way to prevent communication between them.
ME
Melvin
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) inter-EPG isolation.
CH
Charlena
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is C) intra-EPG isolation. It makes the most sense to prevent communication within the same EPG.
CH
Chara
1 year ago
Absolutely, it helps to control the flow of traffic and prevent any unauthorized communication.
VA
Vanna
1 year ago
That's good to know. It's important to have that level of isolation to enhance security.
AL
Aleta
1 year ago
Yes, you are correct. Intra-EPG isolation is the method to prevent communication within the same EPG.