Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-601 Exam - Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer is implementing a configuration checkpoint on a Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The configuration must skip any existing vPC configuration errors and must complete if there are any configuration errors. The engineer finished the vPC domain configuration part. Which command completes the checkpoint implementation?
C) best-effort
A) stop-at-first-failure
B) atomic
D) verbose

Cisco 350-601 Exam - Topic 2 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-601 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 2
[All 350-601 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A network engineer is implementing a configuration checkpoint on a Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. The configuration must skip any existing vPC configuration errors and must complete if there are any configuration errors. The engineer finished the vPC domain configuration part. Which command completes the checkpoint implementation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Merlyn at Apr 25, 2023, 06:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-601 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dion
10 months ago
I thought "verbose" was for logging, not for checkpoints!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
10 months ago
"stop-at-first-failure" won't work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure "atomic" isn't the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaunna
11 months ago
I agree, "best-effort" is the way to go here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
11 months ago
The command is definitely "best-effort."
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that "stop-at-first-failure" is used to halt on errors, so it can't be the answer. I think "best-effort" is the one we want.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose a command that ignores errors. I feel like "atomic" was mentioned, but I don't think that's the right one here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
11 months ago
I think "best-effort" might be the right choice since it allows the process to continue despite errors, but I could be mixing it up with another command.
upvoted 0 times
...
Artie
11 months ago
I remember studying about vPC configurations, but I'm not entirely sure which command to use for skipping errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlota
11 months ago
Wait, I'm confused. The question says utilization rates "typically" do something, so I'm not sure if there's a single clear-cut answer. I'll need to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I think I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
11 months ago
Option C looks promising to me. Using AWS Config and a custom rule to monitor the security groups, and then having an automated Systems Manager Automation document to remediate any issues, seems like a robust and efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
11 months ago
I feel like laborers wouldn't really be on that list... they don’t usually have that level of personal information at risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
Hey, at least the exhibit isn't a picture of a broken Cisco switch. That would really 'checkpoint' your day, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
German
1 year ago
Option D, 'verbose', could be useful for troubleshooting, but it doesn't seem to address the requirement of completing the checkpoint despite configuration errors. I'll have to pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option A, 'stop-at-first-failure'. Why risk continuing with errors when you can just stop and fix them right away?
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but option D, 'verbose', could provide more detailed information to troubleshoot any errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 year ago
I would go with option C, 'best-effort', to try and complete the configuration despite errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
1 year ago
I think option B, 'atomic', might be a better choice for ensuring consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
1 year ago
I agree with you, option A seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rossana
1 year ago
Option B, 'atomic', sounds promising. Wouldn't that guarantee the entire checkpoint is successful or fail completely? Seems like the most reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
Ashleigh
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely, 'atomic' would guarantee the entire checkpoint is successful or fail completely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, 'atomic' seems like the most reliable choice for the configuration checkpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royce
1 year ago
User 1: I think 'atomic' is the best option for ensuring the checkpoint is successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shanice
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd go with option C. 'best-effort' seems like the safest bet to ensure the configuration checkpoint completes, even with any vPC errors.
upvoted 0 times
Melvin
1 year ago
User3: I agree, 'best-effort' seems like the best choice for handling any vPC errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, that sounds like the safest option to complete the checkpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
1 year ago
User1: I think option C, 'best-effort', is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamra
1 year ago
I see your point, but I still think A) stop-at-first-failure is the best choice because it ensures the configuration stops at the first failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) best-effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) stop-at-first-failure.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel