Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 350-601 Exam - Topic 14 Question 40 Discussion

An engineer is implementing traffic monitoring for a server vNIC that is configured with fabric failover enabled. The requirement is for the traffic to be sent to an analyzer, even during a failure of one of the fabric interconnects. The analyzer is connected to unconfigured Ethernet ports on both fabric interconnects. Which configuration accomplishes this task?
A) Create two traffic monitoring sessions with different names, one per fabric Connect the analyzer connected to FI-B as the destination for both monitoring sessions.
B) Create two traffic monitoring sessions with the same name, one per fabric. Connect an analyzer on each Fl as the destination for the monitoring session local to that FI.
C) Create two traffic monitoring sessions with the same name, one per fabric. Connect the analyzer connected to FI-A as the destination for both monitoring sessions.
D) Create two traffic monitoring sessions with different names, one per fabric. Connect an analyzer on each FI as the destination for the monitoring session local to the FI

Cisco 350-601 Exam - Topic 14 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-601 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 14
[All 350-601 Questions]

An engineer is implementing traffic monitoring for a server vNIC that is configured with fabric failover enabled. The requirement is for the traffic to be sent to an analyzer, even during a failure of one of the fabric interconnects. The analyzer is connected to unconfigured Ethernet ports on both fabric interconnects. Which configuration accomplishes this task?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Antione
10 months ago
Definitely leaning towards D, redundancy is key here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
10 months ago
I disagree, A won't work since it only targets one fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
10 months ago
Wait, can you really connect to both FIs like that? Sounds tricky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
11 months ago
I think D is the best choice, having analyzers on both FIs makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
11 months ago
Option B seems right, two sessions with the same name for each fabric.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that having different names for the sessions could be important, but I can't decide if that means option A or D is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
11 months ago
I feel like option B makes sense since it mentions creating sessions with the same name, but I'm not entirely confident if that would work during a failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to ensure redundancy. Connecting analyzers to both fabric interconnects sounds right, but I can't recall the exact setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
11 months ago
I remember something about traffic monitoring sessions needing to be configured per fabric, but I'm not sure if they should have the same name or different names.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about asset states. I'll carefully read through the options and select the three that best match the definition of "baseline asset states".
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is B. The Scan Phase is where file-based discovery happens, as we scan the file system for relevant data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The question mentions a "separate LTM device" that the ISO is already mounted on, so I'm not sure if we'd use the "tmsh" command since that's for the main LTM device. Maybe "bigip_software_create" is the right option?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel