Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 10 Question 75 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Where does it signify that a page will be stopped from loading when a scripting attack is detected?
C) x-xss-protection
A) x-frame-options
B) x-content-type-options
D) x-test-debug

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 10 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 10
[All 350-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Where does it signify that a page will be stopped from loading when a scripting attack is detected?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Earleen at Oct 08, 2023, 10:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Keneth
9 months ago
I’m not convinced that x-xss-protection is enough on its own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nettie
10 months ago
Wait, is x-test-debug even a real thing?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
10 months ago
x-frame-options is for clickjacking, not scripting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
10 months ago
I thought it was A at first, but C makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
10 months ago
It's definitely C, x-xss-protection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
10 months ago
I don't recall x-test-debug being a real security header, so it must be one of the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like x-content-type-options is more about MIME type sniffing, not directly related to stopping scripts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about x-frame-options being used to prevent clickjacking.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 months ago
I think the answer might be C, x-xss-protection, because it relates to cross-site scripting attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
11 months ago
The x-frame-options header is also interesting, but I'm not sure if that's directly related to stopping a scripting attack. I'll have to carefully consider each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
11 months ago
Okay, I've seen the x-xss-protection header before. That seems like the most relevant one for detecting and preventing cross-site scripting attacks. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward security-related question. I'll focus on the HTTP headers mentioned and try to determine which one is most likely to indicate a scripting attack detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with these HTTP headers. I'll need to think through the purpose of each one and how they might relate to stopping a scripting attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one, but I think the Workflow Launchers functionality might be the best option to recommend. It seems like it could be used to trigger a specific workflow when a particular node is changed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details of Prisma Cloud's SSO integration. I'll need to review my notes carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 year ago
C, no doubt about it. The x-xss-protection header is the way to go. Though I gotta say, 'x-test-debug' sounds like something straight out of a comedy sketch. Maybe they should add that to the next version of the standard?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
1 year ago
The answer is definitely C. I've been studying this stuff for weeks, so I better get it right. Hey, at least I'm not the one who thought the answer was 'x-test-debug' - that's gotta be a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marge
1 year ago
C, for sure. I mean, who doesn't love a good ol' x-xss-protection header to keep our sites secure? It's like a superhero for our web pages!
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
1 year ago
D) x-test-debug
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
1 year ago
C) x-xss-protection
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 year ago
B) x-content-type-options
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
1 year ago
A) x-frame-options
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lisha
1 year ago
Easy peasy, it's C. The x-xss-protection header is the way to go here. Gotta keep those pesky hackers out, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 year ago
C) x-xss-protection
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
1 year ago
B) x-content-type-options
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 year ago
A) x-frame-options
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
1 year ago
Hmm, I think the answer is C. The x-xss-protection header is designed to stop the browser from loading a page when a scripting attack is detected. This helps protect against cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 year ago
Yes, it's a crucial security measure to have in place for web applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 year ago
It's important to have that protection in place to prevent scripting attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 year ago
I agree, the x-xss-protection header is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carri
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think x-frame-options also plays a role in preventing attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 year ago
I agree with Mindy, x-xss-protection helps prevent scripting attacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mindy
1 year ago
I think the answer is C) x-xss-protection.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel