Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 10 Question 106 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.For IP 192.168.1.209, what are the risk level, activity, and next step?
A) high risk level, anomalous periodic communication, quarantine with antivirus
B) critical risk level, malicious server IP, run in a sandboxed environment
C) critical risk level, data exfiltration, isolate the device
D) high risk level, malicious host, investigate further

Cisco 350-201 Exam - Topic 10 Question 106 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 350-201 exam
Question #: 106
Topic #: 10
[All 350-201 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

For IP 192.168.1.209, what are the risk level, activity, and next step?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Marnie at Feb 11, 2025, 01:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 350-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Alpha
9 months ago
I agree, isolating the device is the safest bet here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
9 months ago
Quarantine with antivirus? Sounds a bit too casual for a critical risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
10 months ago
Wait, is that IP really linked to a malicious server?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, seems more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
10 months ago
I think it's definitely a critical risk level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
10 months ago
I think "anomalous periodic communication" could indicate a high risk, but I’m not confident about the next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
11 months ago
I keep mixing up the next steps for different risk levels. Should I quarantine or isolate the device?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced about identifying malicious IPs. I think "critical risk" might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
11 months ago
I remember studying risk levels, but I'm not sure if "high risk" or "critical risk" applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a complex issue. I'll need to carefully weigh the options and make sure I select the most appropriate response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
11 months ago
This is a good one to test our understanding of network security. I'll need to think through the potential scenarios and choose the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queen
11 months ago
Alright, time to put my cybersecurity skills to the test. I'll review the options and try to identify the most appropriate response based on the information given.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The IP address is 192.168.1.209, so I'll need to consider the potential risks and activities associated with that address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the information provided in the exhibit to determine the risk level, activity, and next step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
2 years ago
What is this, a choose-your-own-cybersecurity-adventure? I'm just gonna roll the dice and pick one. Eeny, meeny, miny, moe...
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
2 years ago
Quarantine with antivirus, really? That's so 90s. I'm going with C, isolate the device and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
Martin
1 year ago
Yeah, quarantining with antivirus does seem outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
1 year ago
I agree, isolating the device seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
2 years ago
Option B sounds juicy, a critical risk level with a malicious server IP? Gotta love that sandboxed environment! I'm going with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
2 years ago
But the IP address is showing anomalous periodic communication, so I think A is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
2 years ago
Hmm, I'd say D is the way to go. High risk level, malicious host, and investigate further - that covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
Rashad
2 years ago
User 4: Let's not take any chances with high risk levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 years ago
User 3: Definitely, we need to look into that malicious host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. Investigating further is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
2 years ago
User 1: I think D is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
2 years ago
This looks like a classic case of data exfiltration. I'm going with option C, it's the only one that seems to hit all the key points.
upvoted 0 times
Delfina
2 years ago
Yeah, isolating the device is definitely the next step in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricarda
2 years ago
I agree, option C seems like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ayesha
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel