Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-820 Exam - Topic 6 Question 57 Discussion

D18912E1457D5D1DDCBD40AB3BF70D5DRefer to the exhibit showing logs from the Expressway-C, a copy of the Expressway-E certificate, and the UC traversal zone configuration for the Expressway-C. An office administrator is deploying mobile and remote access and sees an issue with the UC traversal zone. The zone is showing ''TLS negotiation failure''. What is causing this issue?
D) The Expressway-E does not have the FQDN of Cisco UCM listed as a SAN in its certificate
A) The Expressway-E certificate includes the Expressway-C FQDN as a SAN entry
B) The Expressway-C is missing the FQDN of Cisco UCM in the Common Name of its certificate
C) In the UC Traversal Zone on the Expressway-C, the peer address is set to the IP of the Expressway-E, which is not a SAN entry in the Expressway-E certificate

Cisco 300-820 Exam - Topic 6 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-820 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 6
[All 300-820 Questions]

D18912E1457D5D1DDCBD40AB3BF70D5D

Refer to the exhibit showing logs from the Expressway-C, a copy of the Expressway-E certificate, and the UC traversal zone configuration for the Expressway-C. An office administrator is deploying mobile and remote access and sees an issue with the UC traversal zone. The zone is showing ''TLS negotiation failure''. What is causing this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Sylvia at May 29, 2023, 09:11 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-820 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Sheridan
10 months ago
D could also be a factor, but C feels right for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
10 months ago
B seems like a strong contender too, but I lean towards C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
10 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple? I thought it could be more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
11 months ago
Definitely agree with C, that makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
11 months ago
I think it's option C, the peer address issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
11 months ago
I think the issue might be with the Expressway-C certificate missing the FQDN of Cisco UCM. That seems to ring a bell from our study sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
11 months ago
I have a vague recollection that if the peer address isn't listed in the SAN, it could cause a negotiation failure. Is that what we're looking at here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mee
11 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where the FQDN was a key factor. I think it might be related to the Expressway-E certificate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
11 months ago
I remember something about SAN entries being crucial for TLS negotiation, but I'm not entirely sure how they apply here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the measures that change managers use to track the progress of a change. I'm leaning towards B, key performance indicators, since that seems to fit best with the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is B - the NSX UI with a supported browser. That's the most direct way to access the NSX Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
11 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. Exchange rates have to do with the relative value of currencies, so that rules out options B, C, and D. I think A is the best fit, but I'll double-check my understanding just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
11 months ago
I think the answer might be Auto VPN, but I can't recall all the details about it.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel