Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-715 Exam - Topic 6 Question 68 Discussion

An administrator is attempting to join a new node to the primary Cisco ISE node, but receives the error message "Node is Unreachable". What is causing this error?
B) No administrative certificate is available for the second node.
A) The second node is a PAN node.
C) The second node is in standalone mode.
D) No admin privileges are available on the second node.

Cisco 300-715 Exam - Topic 6 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-715 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 6
[All 300-715 Questions]

An administrator is attempting to join a new node to the primary Cisco ISE node, but receives the error message "Node is Unreachable". What is causing this error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

https://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=2812072


by Harrison at Mar 30, 2023, 02:12 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-715 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
German
10 months ago
Not sure about that, seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
10 months ago
Wait, could it be A? I thought PAN nodes were fine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iola
10 months ago
Definitely B, I've seen that error before!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
11 months ago
I think it's C, standalone mode could cause that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
11 months ago
It's probably B, no admin cert for the second node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beata
11 months ago
I don't recall much about PAN nodes, but I think they have specific roles. Could option A be a possibility if the second node is misconfigured?
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
11 months ago
I feel like the error could also be due to the node being unreachable because of network issues. None of these options seem to cover that directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederic
11 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where the node was in standalone mode. That might relate to option C, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
11 months ago
I remember something about administrative certificates being crucial for node communication. Could it be option B?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about a specific IBM product, which I'm not too familiar with. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about detecting ghost employee schemes. I think the key is requiring positive ID of the payee, so I'll go with True.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'm going to carefully read through the options and compare them to the configuration details to find the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel