Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-715 Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

An organization is adding nodes to their Cisco ISE deployment and has two nodes designated as primary and secondary PAN and MnT nodes. The organization also has four PSNs An administrator is adding two more PSNs to this deployment but is having problems adding one of them What is the problem?
C) Only five PSNs are allowed to be in the Cisco ISE cube if configured this way.
A) The new nodes must be set to primary prior to being added to the deployment
B) The current PAN is only able to track a max of four nodes
D) One of the new nodes must be designated as a pxGrid node

Cisco 300-715 Exam - Topic 2 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-715 exam
Question #: 57
Topic #: 2
[All 300-715 Questions]

An organization is adding nodes to their Cisco ISE deployment and has two nodes designated as primary and secondary PAN and MnT nodes. The organization also has four PSNs An administrator is adding two more PSNs to this deployment but is having problems adding one of them What is the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lynsey
10 months ago
Option B sounds plausible too, but I lean towards C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
10 months ago
No way, the PAN can handle more than four nodes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
10 months ago
Wait, is that really a limit? I thought we could add more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kindra
11 months ago
Totally agree with you, C makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
11 months ago
I think it's option C, only five PSNs allowed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
11 months ago
I vaguely remember something about pxGrid nodes, but I thought that was only for specific configurations. Not sure if it applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
11 months ago
I feel like the new PSNs don't need to be primary to be added, but I can't recall the exact requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ora
11 months ago
I think I saw a question similar to this where the PAN had a limit on the number of nodes it could manage. Could that be the issue here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
11 months ago
I remember something about node limits in Cisco ISE, but I'm not sure if it's about the number of PSNs or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
11 months ago
Hmm, the policy statement is a bit confusing. I'm not sure if all routes are being accepted or if specific routes are being rejected. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tennie
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk response question. I'll carefully consider the details provided and think through the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
11 months ago
D, all of the above, seems like the logical choice here. The question clearly lists all the necessary inputs, and the answer choices indicate that they can all be found in the sources provided.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel