Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 9 Question 80 Discussion

An engineer defines a new rule while configuring an Access Control Policy. After deploying the policy, the rule is not working as expected and the hit counters associated with the rule are showing zero. What is causing this error?
B) The rule was not enabled after being created.
A) Logging is not enabled for the rule.
C) The wrong source interface for Snort was selected in the rule.
D) An incorrect application signature was used in the rule.

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 9 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 9
[All 300-710 Questions]

An engineer defines a new rule while configuring an Access Control Policy. After deploying the policy, the rule is not working as expected and the hit counters associated with the rule are showing zero. What is causing this error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Mitsue at Feb 08, 2024, 11:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-710 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lura
9 months ago
An incorrect application signature could definitely cause this too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure logging is even the issue here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
10 months ago
Could also be the wrong source interface, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
10 months ago
I agree, that's a common mistake!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
10 months ago
Sounds like the rule wasn't enabled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
10 months ago
I feel like application signatures are crucial, but I can't recall if that would lead to zero hits. Maybe option D is less likely?
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
11 months ago
I practiced a question like this where the source interface was wrong. That could definitely be a possibility with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think if logging isn't enabled, it might not show hits. Could that be option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
11 months ago
I remember something about enabling rules after creating them, so maybe option B is the issue here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
11 months ago
Ah, this is a good one. I'm going to go with B - the rule wasn't enabled after being created. That seems like the most likely explanation for the zero hit counters. But I'll make sure to carefully review all the choices before submitting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
11 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'm leaning towards B, since if the rule wasn't enabled after being created, that would explain why the hit counters aren't registering anything. But I'll need to double-check the other options as well just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. If the rule isn't working as expected and the hit counters are at zero, that makes me think the issue is with the rule configuration itself. I'd start by checking that the rule is enabled and that logging is turned on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. Could it also be something with the source interface or application signature in the rule? I'll have to think through the different options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm thinking it's either A or B - the rule wasn't enabled or logging wasn't turned on, so the hit counters aren't registering anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronica
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The GDPR lists six lawful bases, and this question is asking which one is valid. I'll eliminate the ones that don't fit and select the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is to enable features that encourage peer-to-peer support, like Chatter Questions, and provide a dedicated space for moderators to address common issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by the different routing protocol options here. I'll need to review my VPRN and BGP/LDP knowledge to make sure I select the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the frequency of the second-order intermodulation product, and the formula they give seems to match what I remember learning. I'll work through the calculation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
11 months ago
For some reason, I feel like this is about social engineering? But then again, strong passwords are definitely key to protecting against brute-force too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 years ago
It's possible, but I still think the source interface is more likely the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarah
2 years ago
I don't think so, I'm leaning towards the logging not being enabled for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
2 years ago
But what about the application signature used in the rule? Could that be the problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
2 years ago
I agree with user Tiera, it's likely the wrong interface was selected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
2 years ago
No, I believe the issue is with the source interface for Snort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
2 years ago
I think the rule was not enabled after being created.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
2 years ago
Ah, the old 'incorrect application signature' trick. I've seen that one before. It's always a good idea to double-check the details when configuring these rules.
upvoted 0 times
Paola
2 years ago
Ah, the old 'incorrect application signature' trick. I've seen that one before. It's always a good idea to double-check the details when configuring these rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 years ago
D) An incorrect application signature was used in the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
2 years ago
C) The wrong source interface for Snort was selected in the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
2 years ago
B) The rule was not enabled after being created.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
2 years ago
A) Logging is not enabled for the rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jin
2 years ago
I don't know, guys. What if the engineer selected the wrong source interface for Snort? That could also lead to the rule not working as expected and the hit counters showing zero.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
2 years ago
You make a good point. But I'm leaning more towards the rule not being enabled after creation. That would definitely cause the hit counters to show zero, even if the rule is properly configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
2 years ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. I think the logging issue could be the culprit here. If logging is not enabled, we won't be able to see the hit counters, even if the rule is working correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel