Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 8 Question 37 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit An engineer is modifying an access control pokey to add a rule to inspect all DNS traffic that passes through the firewall After making the change and deploying the pokey they see that DNS traffic is not bang inspected by the Snort engine What is the problem?
A) The rule must specify the security zone that originates the traffic
B) The rule must define the source network for inspection as well as the port
C) The action of the rule is set to trust instead of allow.
D) The rule is configured with the wrong setting for the source port

Cisco 300-710 Exam - Topic 8 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-710 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 8
[All 300-710 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit An engineer is modifying an access control pokey to add a rule to inspect all DNS traffic that passes through the firewall After making the change and deploying the pokey they see that DNS traffic is not bang inspected by the Snort engine What is the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Adelina
9 months ago
Isn't it usually about the source port? Option D might be the culprit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
10 months ago
I disagree, it could be option C. Trust settings can mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefanie
10 months ago
Wait, how can DNS traffic not be inspected? That seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
10 months ago
I think it's definitely option B. You need to define the source network!
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
10 months ago
Sounds like a classic misconfiguration issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the security zone aspect. I thought that was only relevant for routing traffic, so I’m not sure about option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
11 months ago
This question seems familiar, and I think we had a similar practice question where the source port was incorrectly configured. Could it be option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the action of the rule being set to trust could definitely cause issues with inspection. Maybe option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how important it is to specify the source network in our rules, so I think option B might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deane
11 months ago
This one seems straightforward. The settlement profile is where you configure the settlement-related settings, so the two correct answers are definitely defining document management parameters and determining an overhead key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
11 months ago
Alright, I think I've got it. The Contact Delete process would remove data from the Non-Sendable Data Extensions and the Import Files on the Enhanced SFTP. Those are the two correct answers based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
11 months ago
This question seems pretty complex, but I think I can tackle it. The key is to identify the security vulnerabilities and then propose a solution that addresses them.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel