MENU
Recheck the question
Which two terms are types of application isolation options available when Kubenetes is deployed with the SCCM plugin? (Choose two )
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 300-635 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
SU
Sue
11 months ago
Cluster Isolation sounds right, but what about Server Isolation?
YV
Yvonne
11 months ago
Definitely E! Can't believe people mix this up.
IS
Isadora
11 months ago
Wait, is VM Isolation even a thing in this context?
CA
Carin
11 months ago
I think it's A and B, not sure about D.
LU
Lura
12 months ago
Pretty sure it's E and D.
KI
Kirk
12 months ago
Process Isolation sounds familiar, but I’m not entirely sure if it applies in this context. I wish I had reviewed more!
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think VM Isolation was mentioned, but I’m not confident about the other choice.
BE
Beula
1 year ago
I feel like Cluster Isolation might be relevant here, but I can't recall if it's specifically for SCCM with Kubernetes.
HU
Hubert
1 year ago
I think I remember something about Namespace Isolation being one of the options, but I'm not sure about the second one.
YO
Yolande
1 year ago
This seems straightforward. VM Isolation and Process Isolation are the two types of application isolation options mentioned in the question. I'm confident those are the correct answers.
MO
Mozell
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology in this question. I'm not familiar with some of these isolation options. I'll have to guess and hope I get at least one right.
LY
Lynelle
1 year ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. I think VM Isolation and Namespace Isolation are the two correct answers here. Let me double-check that.
ME
Merissa
1 year ago
Okay, let's see... I know Kubernetes has things like namespaces and pods for isolation, but I'm not sure how that maps to the options listed here. I'll have to review my notes on the SCCM plugin.
TE
Tegan
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the types of application isolation options available in Kubernetes with the SCCM plugin.
RE
Rebbeca
1 year ago
Joke's on you, the answer is obviously C and D. Server and process isolation, that's how the pros do it. *winks*
ME
Melynda
1 year ago
Haha, looks like we all have different answers. Let's see who's right!
MA
Marlon
1 year ago
No way, it's definitely A and B. VM and cluster isolation for sure.
EL
Eliseo
1 year ago
Actually, I'm pretty sure it's E and D. Namespace and process isolation.
MA
Markus
1 year ago
I think you might want to double check your answer.
LE
Leonardo
1 year ago
Server isolation? As if Kubernetes would ever let me isolate a whole server. I'm feeling A and E, the classic VM and namespace combo.
HE
Herminia
1 year ago
Ooh, VM isolation, that's a classic. But I think I'm going to go with the more Kubernetes-y options, E and D all the way.
LI
Ling
1 year ago
Process isolation? Sounds like something out of a sci-fi movie. I'm sticking with the real options, E and D for me.
NO
Nohemi
1 year ago
Let's stick with the real options, E and D, for application isolation in Kubernetes.
BL
Blythe
1 year ago
Process isolation does sound like it's from a sci-fi movie, but it's not one of the options here.
FL
Fletcher
1 year ago
I agree, E and D are the correct options for application isolation in Kubernetes.
TE
Terrilyn
1 year ago
Hmm, Kubernetes and SCCM, that's a tricky combo. I'm going to go with B and E, cluster and namespace isolation seem like the logical choices here.
BR
Brock
1 year ago
Definitely, knowing how to configure application isolation is crucial for security and performance.
BR
Brianne
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to understand the different types of isolation available in Kubernetes.
MA
Marion
1 year ago
User3: Definitely, those are the two types of application isolation options available.
RO
Rosina
1 year ago
User2: I agree, cluster and namespace isolation make sense.
EL
Elbert
1 year ago
Yeah, those two options provide different levels of isolation for applications.
MI
Milly
1 year ago
User1: I think B and E are the correct choices.
NO
Noel
1 year ago
I think you're right, cluster and namespace isolation make the most sense.
HO
Hortencia
2 years ago
I'm not sure about Cluster Isolation. Should we reconsider our answers?
ST
Stefan
2 years ago
I agree with Tresa. VM Isolation and Namespace Isolation make sense for application isolation in Kubernetes.
TR
Tresa
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) VM Isolation and E) Namespace Isolation.