MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
When Cisco UCS is configured, which filter must be added to the str_filter string to retrieve all discovered compute blades with two CPUs?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 300-635 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
SH
Sharika
11 months ago
I don't know, D looks kinda tricky to me.
KI
King
11 months ago
A is the correct choice, no doubt about it.
LI
Linn
11 months ago
Surprised that C is even an option, seems wrong.
WA
Wai
11 months ago
I think B is a bit off, not sure about that syntax.
RO
Rosenda
12 months ago
Definitely A, that makes the most sense!
RI
Rikki
12 months ago
I feel like I’ve seen something like option D in our practice tests, but I’m not confident about the syntax being correct.
VI
Vincenza
1 year ago
I thought we were supposed to use "eq" for equality checks, but I can't recall if "discovery" should be "complete" or something else.
CR
Crista
1 year ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to filter based on CPU count. I think option A looks familiar.
FA
Fausto
1 year ago
I remember studying the UCS filter syntax, but I'm not sure if "eq" is the right operator for this question.
WE
Wei
1 year ago
I'm going to go with option D. It looks like it's checking for "num_of_cpus" equal to 2, and "discovery" equal to "complete", which seems to match the requirements.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
Wait, what's the difference between "eq" and "type-eq"? I'm a little confused by the syntax in these options.
JO
Joni
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The question is asking for a filter to retrieve all compute blades with two CPUs, so I'll need to look for an option that checks the "num_of_cpus" field.
EL
Elliott
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the specific criteria they're asking for.
AU
Augustine
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The named network location option won't work since the users share computers. FIDO2 tokens are also not a good fit since the users can't have mobile phones. The Microsoft Authenticator app is the way to go here.
EL
Elvis
2 years ago
Option C is a no-go. 'num_of_cpus eq <2' would give us blades with less than 2 CPUs, which is not what we want.
LA
Latonia
2 years ago
Haha, option B is a bit of a head-scratcher. 'num_of_cpus. 'x2\ type-sum'? Sounds like someone got a little too creative with the syntax there.
PE
Pearly
2 years ago
D) (num_of_cpus. '2', type-eq') and (discovery, 'complete', type-'eq')
DI
Dick
2 years ago
Yeah, option A seems much clearer and straightforward.
MA
Mayra
2 years ago
A) (num_of_cpus eq 2) and (discovery eq complete)
AS
Ashton
2 years ago
I'd go with option D. The filter looks more straightforward and easier to understand than the others.
LA
Lawana
2 years ago
Yes, option D is definitely the most straightforward option for adding the filter.
SK
Skye
2 years ago
I agree, option D seems like the most logical filter to use in this scenario.
RU
Ruby
2 years ago
I think option D is the best choice as well. It seems the most clear and concise.
LA
Lashon
2 years ago
I'd go with option D. The filter looks more straightforward and easier to understand than the others.
AN
Annice
2 years ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
TA
Tabetha
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
ST
Stephen
2 years ago
Option A looks correct to me. We need to filter for compute blades with 2 CPUs, and the 'discovery eq complete' part ensures we only get the fully discovered blades.
AR
Arthur
2 years ago
Yes, option A is the most logical one for filtering compute blades with two CPUs.
AL
Alex
2 years ago
I agree, option A seems to be the right choice.
AN
Annice
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.