Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 6 Question 67 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Which two configurations enable inter-VRF communication? (Choose two.)
B) Enable Advertise Externally under the subnet scope. and C) Export the contract and import as a contract interface.
A) Set the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs.
D) Change the contract scope to Tenant.
E) Change the subject scope to VRF.

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 6 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 6
[All 300-620 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Which two configurations enable inter-VRF communication? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Blondell at Jan 25, 2024, 04:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Robt
9 months ago
I disagree, I thought E was necessary for communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
9 months ago
Wait, can you really set the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashida
10 months ago
D doesn't seem like it would work for inter-VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
10 months ago
I think B is also a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawn
10 months ago
A and C are the right choices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
10 months ago
I feel like enabling Advertise Externally could be important, but I can't remember if it's necessary for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the contract scope. Changing it to Tenant sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that actually helps with inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
11 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where exporting and importing contracts was key for inter-VRF communication. Could that be option C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
11 months ago
I think setting the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs might be one of the answers, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
11 months ago
I've seen questions like this before. The key is to understand how VRFs isolate traffic and the different configuration options to enable communication between them. I believe A and B are the right choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
11 months ago
I'm feeling a bit lost on this one. The terminology and concepts around VRFs are not my strongest area. I'll need to review my notes and try to reason through the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. Based on my understanding, the key is to find the options that allow traffic to flow between different VRFs. I think A and B are the correct choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover different aspects of VRF configuration, but I'm not entirely sure which two would enable the inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronna
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky networking question. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the concepts of inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about how the "Current User" filter works when searching on the Policy Owner field. I think the correct answer is D, since the search results should only include records where the user running the search is listed as the Policy Owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about payment models. I think the key is to consider the fixed traffic pattern of the online ticket booking service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Is it possible the answer could be A or B as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
11 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd say the answer is B - Planning, since that's when you'd want to define your audience's positions in the social media funnel before launching the actual campaigns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
2 years ago
You know, I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up with this one. They always love to sneak in those tricky questions that make you second-guess yourself. But I'm not falling for it this time!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
2 years ago
Alright, let's take a closer look at the options. A and B seem related to the subnet scope, which could be relevant. C and D seem to be about the contract settings, and E is about the subject scope. I'm going to have to think this one through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
Tammara
2 years ago
E) Change the subject scope to VRF.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
2 years ago
We should consider how each option relates to enabling communication between VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 years ago
D) Change the contract scope to Tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
2 years ago
B) Enable Advertise Externally under the subnet scope.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
2 years ago
Those options seem to focus on different aspects of the configuration. We need to choose the ones that will enable inter-VRF communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
2 years ago
C) Export the contract and import as a contract interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 years ago
A) Set the subnet scope to Shared Between VRFs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vilma
2 years ago
Hmm, inter-VRF communication, huh? I bet it has something to do with the subnet scope and how we're handling the contracts. This is going to be a tough one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Henriette
2 years ago
This question looks tricky, but I think I've got a handle on it. Let's see, the key is enabling inter-VRF communication, so we need to find the right configurations for that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel