Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. Server A is connected to the Cisco ACI fabric using two teamed interfaces. One interface in a team is configured as active and the other remains in standby mode. When a failover occurs and the standby interface becomes active, it uses its built-in MAC address to send traffic. Which bridge domain configuration must be applied to resolve the issue?
A) Configure Hardware proxy.
B) Set L2 Unknown Unicast to Flood.
C) Enable ARP flooding.
D) Activate Limit IP Learning to Subnet.

Cisco 300-620 Exam - Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-620 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All 300-620 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Server A is connected to the Cisco ACI fabric using two teamed interfaces. One interface in a team is configured as active and the other remains in standby mode. When a failover occurs and the standby interface becomes active, it uses its built-in MAC address to send traffic. Which bridge domain configuration must be applied to resolve the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Caprice at Dec 14, 2023, 03:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-620 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Merissa
9 months ago
Definitely not D, that won't help with the failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenita
9 months ago
C could also be a solution, but not sure if it's the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
Wait, I didn't know the MAC address could cause issues like this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
10 months ago
I disagree, B seems more effective for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
10 months ago
I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
10 months ago
I think enabling ARP flooding could help with the MAC address issue, but I'm not completely confident about it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colby
11 months ago
I feel like I might have seen a question about L2 Unknown Unicast before, but I can't recall if it was the right solution for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
11 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to manage MAC addresses in a failover scenario. I think it might be related to ARP flooding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
11 months ago
I remember something about MAC address issues when failover happens, but I'm not sure which option directly addresses that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
11 months ago
Flooding the L2 unknown unicast traffic could be a quick fix, but I'm not sure if that's the most elegant or efficient solution. I'll weigh the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the concept of "hardware proxy" - I'll need to research that option more to see if it's the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key seems to be understanding how the failover and MAC address handling work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnna
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and the options to figure out the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
11 months ago
Enabling ARP flooding seems like it might work, but I want to make sure that's not going to cause any other issues down the line. Gotta think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
11 months ago
Okay, let me see here. If the timeline is aggressive, the business analyst should probably focus on getting the foundational pieces in place quickly. I'm leaning towards option D, documenting how the relevant systems interact, as that could help inform the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how crucial it is to provide positive reinforcement, but I'm not sure which option really aligns best with ethical practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
2 years ago
I was also considering B, but option D also caught my eye. Limiting IP learning to the subnet could help prevent any issues with the MAC address change, since the traffic would be confined to the local subnet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option B. If the MAC address change is causing issues, setting L2 Unknown Unicast to Flood might help by ensuring that the traffic gets delivered even with the MAC address change.
upvoted 0 times
Zona
2 years ago
Let's go with option B then. It seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
2 years ago
I'm not sure. Option B seems to be the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
2 years ago
So, should we go with option C then?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
2 years ago
That's true, ARP flooding could also be beneficial in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamey
2 years ago
But wouldn't enabling ARP flooding also help with the MAC address change?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 years ago
I think option B is a good choice too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trinidad
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. The exhibit doesn't provide much context, so it's hard to know exactly what's happening. But I think the key is that the MAC address change is causing some kind of problem in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
2 years ago
This question seems a bit tricky. I'm not sure if I fully understand the issue with the standby interface using its built-in MAC address.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel