MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
An engineer is troubleshooting the connectivity between Server-1 and Server-2. Which action resolves the connectivity issue?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 300-615 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
GL
Glenna
11 months ago
I’m surprised this is even a question, it’s pretty basic!
TR
Tran
11 months ago
Definitely not C, that’s unrelated to the issue.
KE
Kenny
11 months ago
Wait, can changing port types really fix connectivity?
RO
Royce
11 months ago
I think option B makes more sense here.
KR
Kris
12 months ago
BGP advertise pip feature is crucial for connectivity!
CR
Cristy
12 months ago
Changing ports to port-type fabric sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that would actually resolve a connectivity issue between servers.
YO
Yoko
1 year ago
I’m a bit confused about the CFS messages and their role in this scenario. I don’t recall them being a priority in connectivity issues.
IZ
Izetta
1 year ago
I remember a similar question where configuring source IP addresses was crucial for communication between devices. It might be option B.
VI
Viola
1 year ago
I think enabling the BGP advertise pip feature could be the right move, but I'm not entirely sure how it directly affects connectivity.
MA
Makeda
1 year ago
This is a good test of my networking troubleshooting skills. I'll carefully consider each option and try to identify the one that most directly addresses the connectivity problem shown in the diagram.
SO
Sommer
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the spine switch configuration options. Changing all ports to port-type fabric in option D doesn't seem directly relevant to the server connectivity issue.
RO
Roselle
1 year ago
Okay, I see the problem now. The key is to get the leaf switches communicating properly. I'm leaning towards option A to enable the BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches.
TH
Theodora
1 year ago
Hmm, the connectivity issue between the servers seems to be related to the leaf switches. I think option B about configuring the same source IP on the NVE and virtual peer link might be the way to go.
CH
Chantell
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky networking question. I'll need to carefully analyze the diagram and options to determine the best solution.
PE
Penney
1 year ago
Okay, let me see. A changeable key allows you to work with dynamic numbering for financial items, right? I'm pretty sure that's the correct answer, but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.
HE
Heidy
1 year ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. There are a lot of options to choose from. I think I'll just make an educated guess and move on.
JA
Jacqueline
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully break down the details and apply the right formulas to get the functional size.
ER
Erick
1 year ago
Wait, is this a Cisco exam? If so, I'm pretty sure the answer is always 'configure the Cisco recommended best practices'.
RY
Ryan
1 year ago
C) Classify CFS messages for strict priority queue on spine switches
EM
Emerson
1 year ago
B) Configure the same source IP address on NVE and virtual peer link on leaf switches
BL
Blair
1 year ago
A) Enable BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches
DU
Dulce
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the engineer is just trying to turn it off and on again. But seriously, I think C - classifying the CFS messages for strict priority queue on the spine switches is the way to go.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
Oh, I got it! The answer has to be A - enabling the BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches. That should resolve the connectivity problem.
BA
Barney
1 year ago
Great! Let's go ahead and configure that to resolve the problem.
NI
Nieves
1 year ago
I agree, that seems like the most logical solution to the connectivity issue.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
Yes, enabling the BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches should definitely help.
AS
Ashanti
1 year ago
I'm not sure about that. The question mentions troubleshooting the connectivity, so I'm leaning towards D - changing all ports on the spine switches to port-type fabric.
LI
Linette
1 year ago
Classifying CFS messages for strict priority queue on spine switches could help with the connectivity issue.
LI
Lilli
1 year ago
Configuring the same source IP address on NVE and virtual peer link on leaf switches could be a good solution.
HY
Hyman
1 year ago
I think enabling BGP advertise pip feature on both leaf switches might also work.
VA
Vallie
1 year ago
Option D seems like the best choice to me.
JU
Julio
2 years ago
Hmm, the connectivity issue seems to be related to the VXLAN configuration. I think the answer is B - configuring the same source IP address on the NVE and virtual peer link on the leaf switches.
KA
Karma
2 years ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I'll have to reconsider my choice then.
WI
Willodean
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D. Changing all ports on spine switches as port-type fabric seems like the best solution.
KA
Karma
2 years ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring the same source IP address on NVE and virtual peer link makes sense.