MENU
An engineer is troubleshooting a custom AV pair that was created by a client on an external authentication server to map a read-only role for a specific security domain. Which AV pair solves the problem?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 300-615 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
SH
Shawnda
6 months ago
I feel like D is the safest bet. Clear and concise for the security domain.
MA
Margurite
6 months ago
D is straightforward. No confusion about the read-only aspect.
TH
Thora
7 months ago
A is not right. We need a read-only role, not a mix.
MA
Madalyn
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards A. It includes multiple read roles, which could be useful.
LI
Lisbeth
7 months ago
I agree, D seems correct. It matches the requirements perfectly.
FR
Francine
7 months ago
I think option D is the best choice. It clearly specifies the read-only role.
CA
Catherin
7 months ago
I agree with D, looks like the best fit!
PA
Pamella
8 months ago
Wait, is it really that simple?
JA
Jacquline
8 months ago
No way, B is not a read-only role!
VI
Vincent
8 months ago
I think A could work too, but not sure.
BE
Beckie
8 months ago
D is the one. Mapping read-only roles is a piece of cake with this AV pair.
CO
Colene
9 months ago
I agree, D seems to be the right answer based on the problem description.
SH
Sheridan
9 months ago
I feel like the read-only role should definitely be in the AV pair, so I’m leaning towards option A or D, but I can't recall the exact syntax we discussed.
PE
Penney
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the difference between "domains" and just "shell" in the options. I hope I can remember the specifics during the exam.
OC
Octavio
9 months ago
I think option D looks familiar since it specifies "shell:domains" and includes both read roles. That might be the right choice.
AD
Adaline
9 months ago
I remember we practiced a similar question about AV pairs, but I’m not entirely sure which option is correct here.
LI
Lindy
9 months ago
Based on the wording of the question, I'm guessing the correct answer is the one that specifically mentions "Read_Role_1|Read_Role_2" for the security domain. That seems to be the key requirement they're looking for.
JA
Jaclyn
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the terminology here. What exactly is an "AV pair" and how does it relate to authentication and security domains? I'll need to do some research to understand the concepts better.
PA
Paz
10 months ago
I think option D might be the answer, since it mentions "shell:domains=" which seems to match the format they're looking for. But I'm not 100% sure.
DA
Darrin
10 months ago
Option D is definitely the right choice.
KE
Kelvin
10 months ago
Option D looks correct, it specifies the security domain and the read-only roles.
SH
Shelton
11 months ago
D is the way to go. Gotta love those read-only roles!
AP
Apolonia
11 months ago
D is the answer, but I'm still trying to figure out why the client needed a custom AV pair in the first place.
VA
Vallie
11 months ago
Okay, the key seems to be identifying the correct AV pair that maps a read-only role for a specific security domain. I'll need to analyze each option closely.
WH
Whitley
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the question and options to understand the context and requirements.
JA
Janessa
6 months ago
D definitely aligns with the security domain and read roles.
FR
Francisca
6 months ago
But A includes a write role, which isn’t right for read-only.
GA
Gaynell
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards A, though. It has both roles listed.
EL
Ellsworth
6 months ago
Yeah, it seems to fit the read-only requirement.
GR
Graciela
10 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.