Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 2 Question 124 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.An engineer discovers that if the vPC peer link goes down, half of the devices in VLAN 20 experience connectivity issues with the external networks Which action resolves the issue?
C) Add the non-vPC SVIs in the dual-active exclude VLAN list
A) Configure a dedicated Layer 3 link between vPC peers
B) Allow non-vPC VLANs on a second trunk between the two vPC peers
D) Exclude the non-vPC VLANs from vPC peer link

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 2 Question 124 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-615 exam
Question #: 124
Topic #: 2
[All 300-615 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer discovers that if the vPC peer link goes down, half of the devices in VLAN 20 experience connectivity issues with the external networks Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Dorinda at May 03, 2026, 05:32 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-615 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karon
3 days ago
D simplifies the peer link. Reduces complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
8 days ago
C prevents dual-active problems. Important for stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
13 days ago
B allows for more VLANs. Might help with connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
19 days ago
A ensures a dedicated path. Less chance of issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
24 days ago
D seems solid. Keeping non-vPC VLANs separate is smart.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
29 days ago
I’m leaning towards C. Excluding SVIs makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
1 month ago
I feel like B is a good choice too. More flexibility!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hayley
1 month ago
This question is tricky! I think option A could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
1 month ago
Non-vPC VLANs should definitely be excluded from the peer link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
2 months ago
I disagree, adding SVIs to the exclude list seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
2 months ago
Wait, half of VLAN 20 devices lose connectivity? That's wild!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
2 months ago
I think excluding non-vPC VLANs from the peer link makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
2 months ago
A dedicated Layer 3 link is usually the best bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ula
2 months ago
I think excluding non-vPC VLANs from the peer link could resolve the connectivity issues, but I need to double-check the specifics on how that affects traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the implications of each option. I feel like adding SVIs to the exclude list might help, but I’m not entirely certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
4 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to manage VLANs in a vPC setup. I think option A could be a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
4 months ago
I remember something about how vPC peer links work, but I'm not sure if excluding non-vPC VLANs is the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel