Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-615 Exam - Topic 2 Question 124 Discussion

Posted by Dorinda on May 03, 2026 at 05:32 PM

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer discovers that if the vPC peer link goes down, half of the devices in VLAN 20 experience connectivity issues with the external networks Which action resolves the issue?

Suggested Answer: C

Get Premium 300-615 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
23 comments · newest first
DE
Deangelo 17 days ago
A is the safest bet. We need reliability in peer links.
LE
Letha 22 days ago
I feel like B is risky. Non-vPC VLANs on a trunk could complicate it.
LU
Lucy 27 days ago
Option C could work too. Excluding SVIs might stabilize things.
CE
Celia 1 month ago
I’m leaning towards D. Excluding non-vPC VLANs might resolve issues.
HI
Hildegarde 1 month ago
I agree, A seems solid. A dedicated link could help.
ON
Onita 1 month ago
This question is tricky. I think option A makes sense.
KA
Karon 2 months ago
D simplifies the peer link. Reduces complexity.
RE
Reyes 2 months ago
C prevents dual-active problems. Important for stability.
YU
Yuki 2 months ago
B allows for more VLANs. Might help with connectivity.
HA
Hayley 2 months ago
A ensures a dedicated path. Less chance of issues.
KA
Karon 2 months ago
D seems solid. Keeping non-vPC VLANs separate is smart.
RE
Reyes 2 months ago
I’m leaning towards C. Excluding SVIs makes sense.
YU
Yuki 3 months ago
I feel like B is a good choice too. More flexibility!
HA
Hayley 3 months ago
This question is tricky! I think option A could work.
KE
Kenneth 3 months ago
Non-vPC VLANs should definitely be excluded from the peer link.
WA
Wava 3 months ago
I disagree, adding SVIs to the exclude list seems unnecessary.
NA
Nathan 3 months ago
Wait, half of VLAN 20 devices lose connectivity? That's wild!
LA
Lasandra 3 months ago
I think excluding non-vPC VLANs from the peer link makes sense too.
MA
Maryann 4 months ago
A dedicated Layer 3 link is usually the best bet.
UL
Ula 4 months ago
I think excluding non-vPC VLANs from the peer link could resolve the connectivity issues, but I need to double-check the specifics on how that affects traffic.
MI
Mireya 5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the implications of each option. I feel like adding SVIs to the exclude list might help, but I’m not entirely certain.
LA
Laura 6 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to manage VLANs in a vPC setup. I think option A could be a good choice.
VE
Veta 6 months ago
I remember something about how vPC peer links work, but I'm not sure if excluding non-vPC VLANs is the right approach here.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel