MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. A customer requires a VXLAN fabric deployment with these requirements:
* DNS must be a shared service.
* Users will not require direct sharing of resources with other users.
* The deployment must use the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.
Which action must the customer take to meet these criteria?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium 300-610 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
AN
Annmarie
11 months ago
Shared DNS is a must, but I'm not sure about the VNI choices.
FR
Frankie
11 months ago
VTEP1 sounds right for this setup.
ST
Stephanie
11 months ago
Wait, why would we use VNI 5000? Seems off.
MA
Marvel
11 months ago
Definitely agree, less config is key!
GA
Gary
12 months ago
I think VNI 3002 is the way to go.
LA
Lajuana
12 months ago
I recall that using the least configuration intensive approach is crucial, but I can't remember if that means VNI 5000 or 3002.
MA
Marta
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the shared DNS requirement. Does that affect which VTEP we should use?
CO
Corrie
1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on VTEP configurations. I feel like VNI 3002 might be the right choice for this scenario.
CL
Clare
1 year ago
I remember something about VNI and how it relates to route leaking, but I'm not sure which VNI to choose here.
MA
Marti
1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements around DNS and resource sharing are clear, but I'm not sure which VTEP and VNI combination will meet the criteria best. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
JE
Jesse
1 year ago
Okay, let's see here. The key requirements seem to be using a shared DNS service and avoiding direct resource sharing between users. I think I need to focus on the VTEP and VNI details to determine the right approach.
LI
Ligia
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky VXLAN question. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best way to achieve route leaking with the least configuration.
CY
Cyndy
1 year ago
Alright, this is a good one. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out. The least configuration intensive approach is the key, so I'll need to analyze the VTEP and VNI options closely.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward risk mitigation question. Marsha is taking extra steps to prevent the risk event from happening, which aligns with the mitigation response.
CH
Charlena
1 year ago
I'm with Ettie on this one. VXLAN can be a real brain-twister, but I think Tonette and Bernadine have the right idea. Time to put on my thinking cap and nail this question!
IS
Isabelle
1 year ago
Let's go with that option then. Thanks for the input, guys!
ST
Stefany
1 year ago
I agree, that seems like the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
I think the answer is to encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
ET
Ettie
1 year ago
Hmm, this question is making my head spin. At least it's not as bad as that time I tried to configure a VXLAN fabric while blindfolded. That was a real nightmare!
VI
Vivan
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I agree with Tonette that option C is the way to go. Encapsulating the traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002 sounds like the simplest and most straightforward solution.
KA
Kaycee
1 year ago
Let's go with encapsulating traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
RA
Rasheeda
1 year ago
Agreed, it seems like the most efficient solution.
RO
Roxane
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice.
BE
Bernadine
1 year ago
Options A and B don't seem to address the requirement of using the least configuration intensive approach for route leaking. Option D would encapsulate the traffic on the wrong VTEP, so that's not the right choice either.
TR
Tresa
1 year ago
Looks like option C is the best choice for the customer's requirements.
HI
Hildred
1 year ago
Exactly, it also ensures that DNS is a shared service and users do not directly share resources with each other.
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
That makes sense, it meets the requirement of using the least configuration intensive approach for route leaking.
RO
Romana
1 year ago
C) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
TO
Tonette
2 years ago
The question is asking about the best way to set up a VXLAN fabric deployment with specific requirements. I think option C is the correct answer since VTEP1 should encapsulate the traffic with VNI 3002 to meet the criteria of a shared DNS service and no direct resource sharing between users.
EL
Elina
1 year ago
Yes, VTEP1 encapsulating traffic with VNI 3002 aligns with the criteria mentioned in the question.
LI
Lillian
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the best choice for meeting the customer's requirements.
TE
Tegan
2 years ago
But the requirements mention using the least configuration intensive approach, so VTEP1 with VNI 3002 makes more sense.
GW
Gwenn
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe encapsulating traffic on VTEP2 with VNI 5000 is the best approach.
TE
Tegan
2 years ago
I think the customer should encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.