Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 9 Question 96 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. A customer requires a VXLAN fabric deployment with these requirements:* DNS must be a shared service.* Users will not require direct sharing of resources with other users.* The deployment must use the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.Which action must the customer take to meet these criteria?
D) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 5000.
A) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP2 with VNI 3002.
B) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP2 with VNI 5000.
C) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 9 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 9
[All 300-610 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. A customer requires a VXLAN fabric deployment with these requirements:

* DNS must be a shared service.

* Users will not require direct sharing of resources with other users.

* The deployment must use the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.

Which action must the customer take to meet these criteria?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Edison at Sep 13, 2024, 01:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annmarie
9 months ago
Shared DNS is a must, but I'm not sure about the VNI choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
9 months ago
VTEP1 sounds right for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 months ago
Wait, why would we use VNI 5000? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
10 months ago
Definitely agree, less config is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
10 months ago
I think VNI 3002 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lajuana
10 months ago
I recall that using the least configuration intensive approach is crucial, but I can't remember if that means VNI 5000 or 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marta
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the shared DNS requirement. Does that affect which VTEP we should use?
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrie
11 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on VTEP configurations. I feel like VNI 3002 might be the right choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
11 months ago
I remember something about VNI and how it relates to route leaking, but I'm not sure which VNI to choose here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirements around DNS and resource sharing are clear, but I'm not sure which VTEP and VNI combination will meet the criteria best. I'll need to think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
11 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key requirements seem to be using a shared DNS service and avoiding direct resource sharing between users. I think I need to focus on the VTEP and VNI details to determine the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky VXLAN question. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think about the best way to achieve route leaking with the least configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
11 months ago
Alright, this is a good one. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out. The least configuration intensive approach is the key, so I'll need to analyze the VTEP and VNI options closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward risk mitigation question. Marsha is taking extra steps to prevent the risk event from happening, which aligns with the mitigation response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlena
1 year ago
I'm with Ettie on this one. VXLAN can be a real brain-twister, but I think Tonette and Bernadine have the right idea. Time to put on my thinking cap and nail this question!
upvoted 0 times
Isabelle
1 year ago
Let's go with that option then. Thanks for the input, guys!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
1 year ago
I agree, that seems like the least configuration intensive approach to achieve route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
1 year ago
I think the answer is to encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
1 year ago
Hmm, this question is making my head spin. At least it's not as bad as that time I tried to configure a VXLAN fabric while blindfolded. That was a real nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
1 year ago
This is a tricky one, but I agree with Tonette that option C is the way to go. Encapsulating the traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002 sounds like the simplest and most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Kaycee
1 year ago
Let's go with encapsulating traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
1 year ago
Agreed, it seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
Options A and B don't seem to address the requirement of using the least configuration intensive approach for route leaking. Option D would encapsulate the traffic on the wrong VTEP, so that's not the right choice either.
upvoted 0 times
Tresa
1 year ago
Looks like option C is the best choice for the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
1 year ago
Exactly, it also ensures that DNS is a shared service and users do not directly share resources with each other.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
1 year ago
That makes sense, it meets the requirement of using the least configuration intensive approach for route leaking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Romana
1 year ago
C) Encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tonette
1 year ago
The question is asking about the best way to set up a VXLAN fabric deployment with specific requirements. I think option C is the correct answer since VTEP1 should encapsulate the traffic with VNI 3002 to meet the criteria of a shared DNS service and no direct resource sharing between users.
upvoted 0 times
Elina
1 year ago
Yes, VTEP1 encapsulating traffic with VNI 3002 aligns with the criteria mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lillian
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems to be the best choice for meeting the customer's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
1 year ago
But the requirements mention using the least configuration intensive approach, so VTEP1 with VNI 3002 makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe encapsulating traffic on VTEP2 with VNI 5000 is the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
I think the customer should encapsulate traffic on VTEP1 with VNI 3002.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel