Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 8 Question 94 Discussion

Posted by Ira on Aug 06, 2024 at 02:38 PM

An architect must automate routine tasks within a data center The data center exclusively uses Cisco Nexus Series Switches The networking team lacks proper programming knowledge and prefers an automation solution that leverages NXOS commands Any configuration change must use HTTPS for transport due to a security compliance requirement. Which solution must the architect choose?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
VA
Valda 11 months ago
I’m not convinced NX-API is the best choice here.
AD
Adolph 11 months ago
Chef and Terraform are cool, but not for this setup.
HE
Helga 11 months ago
Wait, can NX-API really handle HTTPS compliance?
MA
Maryanne 11 months ago
Totally agree, it fits the requirements perfectly.
EM
Emmanuel 12 months ago
NX-API is the way to go for NXOS commands!
EL
Elliot 12 months ago
I thought Python-API could be a good option too, but it might not align with the requirement to use NXOS commands directly. I guess NX-API is more straightforward for this case.
AL
Alecia 1 year ago
Chef and Terraform seem more like infrastructure as code tools, so I doubt they would work for this specific scenario. Still, I’m a bit confused about the HTTPS part.
GE
Geoffrey 1 year ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to choose an automation tool for Cisco devices. I feel like NX-API fits best here, but I could be wrong.
CH
Christiane 1 year ago
I think NX-API might be the right choice since it directly uses NXOS commands, but I'm not entirely sure about the HTTPS requirement.
FE
Felix 1 year ago
This is a good one. The key is that the networking team prefers an automation solution that leverages NXOS commands, and NX-API is designed for that. The HTTPS requirement also points to NX-API as the best fit. I'm confident this is the right answer.
NA
Nana 1 year ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. It seems like NX-API is the most relevant solution, but I want to make sure I'm not missing something. I might need to review the details of each option to be sure I'm making the right choice.
JO
Joseph 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions the networking team lacks programming knowledge, so I'm not sure if Python-API or the other options would be a good fit. I'll have to think this through carefully.
MA
Mariann 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question. The key requirements are using Cisco Nexus switches and HTTPS for security, so I think NX-API is the best choice here.
MA
Marcelle 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. We need an automation solution that works with Cisco Nexus switches and supports HTTPS. NX-API seems like the obvious choice since it's designed specifically for Cisco switches. The other options like Chef and Terraform are more general-purpose tools.
LE
Leah 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the options fully before selecting an answer.
CR
Cristina 1 year ago
"Brainstorming" doesn't fit; that's more about generating ideas collectively. Could it really be "conflicting"?
ED
Edison 2 years ago
I bet the architect who suggested Terraform is the same one who tried to solve world hunger by ordering a truckload of Snickers bars.
WE
Wenona 2 years ago
Terraform? Really? That's like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Way overkill for a simple data center automation task.
JU
Juan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wenona
C: Definitely, Terraform seems like too much for this task.
NA
Nan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wenona
B: I agree, using NX-API would be more efficient than Terraform.
TE
Teri 2 years ago
↳ replying to Wenona
A: NX-API sounds like the best fit for this scenario.
HE
Hermila 2 years ago
Ooh, Python-API could be interesting. It would give the team a chance to dip their toes into programming without going too deep. But NX-API is probably the safer bet for this scenario.
HE
Herschel 2 years ago
I agree, NX-API is the way to go. It's secure with HTTPS and the team won't have to learn a new programming language. Doesn't get much simpler than that.
MA
Marisha 2 years ago
↳ replying to Herschel
D: It's a simple and efficient solution for automating routine tasks in the data center.
PR
Precious 2 years ago
↳ replying to Herschel
C: The networking team will appreciate not having to learn a new programming language.
IR
Irving 2 years ago
↳ replying to Herschel
B: I agree, it's great that it uses HTTPS for security compliance.
VE
Verona 2 years ago
↳ replying to Herschel
A: NX-API is definitely the best choice for this scenario.
AL
Alishia 2 years ago
NX-API seems like the obvious choice here. It's built right into the Nexus switches and will work seamlessly with the NXOS commands the team is comfortable with.
BA
Barney 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alishia
B) Python-API
EL
Elmer 2 years ago
↳ replying to Alishia
A) NX-API
LA
Lashunda 2 years ago
I think Chef could be a viable solution as well, as it is commonly used for automation tasks.
KE
Kendra 2 years ago
I believe Python-API could also be a good option since it allows for automation and scripting.
OZ
Ozell 2 years ago
I agree with Anabel, NX-API seems like the best solution for this scenario.
AN
Anabel 2 years ago
I think the architect should choose NX-API because it leverages NXOS commands.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel