Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 8 Question 111 Discussion

Posted by Mendy on Jun 12, 2025 at 12:54 PM

An engineer finishes the initial set up of a VXLAN EVPN network. The engineer is asked to plan for connectivity that supports redundancy and extends multiple virtual routing and forwarding domains. The requirement is to use the same default gateway addressing across all leaf switches that belong to the VXLAN network. Which two solution must be used to meet these requirements? (Choose two)

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
CR
Cristal 10 months ago
Surprised that they want to use the same default gateway across all leaves!
JI
Jina 10 months ago
I think A is still relevant in some cases, but not here.
AL
Alesia 10 months ago
Definitely going with C and B for this setup.
EL
Eliseo 11 months ago
D and E don't really fit the redundancy requirement, right?
RO
Rosendo 11 months ago
C is a must for anycast, but I'm not sure about B.
JI
Jimmie 11 months ago
I vaguely recall a practice question about anycast gateways. They seemed crucial for maintaining the same default gateway across multiple leaf switches.
TO
Tonja 11 months ago
I feel like spanning tree protocol might not be the best fit for this scenario since it’s more about loop prevention than redundancy in VXLAN.
RI
Ricarda 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think VRF-lite could be relevant here for separating traffic across different routing domains.
EM
Emerson 12 months ago
I remember studying about distributed anycast gateways in VXLAN setups. They help with redundancy, right?
TE
Temeka 12 months ago
I think I've got it. Distributed anycast gateway to provide the same default gateway, and VRF-lite to support multiple VRFs. Time to mark my answers.
GA
Gail 1 year ago
Spanning tree protocol won't work here since we need to use the same default gateway across all leaf switches. Distributed anycast gateway is the key.
TE
Tesha 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on the redundancy aspect. Let me re-read the question and see if I can figure out the right approach.
SH
Shawna 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Distributed anycast gateway and VRF-lite are the two solutions that meet the requirements.
ZA
Zana 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the VXLAN EVPN requirements carefully.
EL
Eliz 1 year ago
Hmm, C and D sound like the right combo to me. Although I'm secretly hoping for a 'hire a skywriting plane to advertise the answer' option.
HO
Holley 1 year ago
C and D for sure. If this was a real-world network, I'd also throw in a 'break glass in case of emergency' button just in case.
GL
Glendora 1 year ago
↳ replying to Holley
Definitely, redundancy is key in network setups.
TR
Trevor 1 year ago
↳ replying to Holley
Good choices! Having a backup plan is always a good idea.
WI
Winfred 1 year ago
↳ replying to Holley
D) DC interconnect
NA
Nana 1 year ago
↳ replying to Holley
C) Distributed anycast gateway
TE
Terry 1 year ago
C and D are definitely the way to go. Although I'm a bit disappointed there's no option for 'all of the above and a free kitten'.
YV
Yvonne 1 year ago
I'm going with C and D as well. Gotta love that distributed anycast gateway, it's like a superhighway for your network traffic!
NE
Nelida 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yvonne
Using DC interconnect will definitely help extend the virtual routing and forwarding domains seamlessly.
KR
Kris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yvonne
I agree, the distributed anycast gateway is a game changer for network redundancy.
PA
Pa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yvonne
DC interconnect is also crucial for extending virtual routing domains across multiple sites.
GL
Glenna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yvonne
DC interconnect is also crucial for extending virtual routing domains seamlessly.
GL
Glennis 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yvonne
I agree, distributed anycast gateway is a game changer for network redundancy.
AL
Alonzo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Yvonne
I agree, distributed anycast gateway is a game changer for network redundancy.
MI
Minna 1 year ago
I'm not sure about the answer, but I think VRF-lite could also be a possible solution for this scenario.
RU
Rueben 1 year ago
I agree with Jaclyn, using Distributed anycast gateway can provide redundancy and extend multiple virtual routing domains.
JA
Jaclyn 1 year ago
I think the answer is C) Distributed anycast gateway.
FR
Frank 1 year ago
C and D seem like the right choices here. Distributed anycast gateway for the same default gateway across the leaf switches, and DC interconnect for redundancy and multiple VRF domains.
SU
Suzan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frank
Definitely, it's important to have a consistent default gateway and ensure connectivity across multiple domains.
NA
Nadine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frank
I agree, those two options cover the redundancy and VRF requirements.
ST
Stefan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frank
D) DC interconnect
ST
Staci 1 year ago
↳ replying to Frank
C) Distributed anycast gateway
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel