Cisco 300-610 Exam - Topic 7 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-610 exam

Question #: 95
Topic #: 7

The data center aggregation layer that uses IPv4 and IPv6 address space must act as a redundant Layer 3 gateway The solution must support a minimum of 240 virtual groups for an interface The data center aggregation layer hosts network devices from different vendors Which FHRP solution meets these requirements?

AHSRPv1

BVRRPV3

CVRRPv1

DHSRPv2

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Gaynell at Aug 23, 2024, 09:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-610 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cyndy

9 months ago

Really? I’m surprised HSRPv2 is still relevant for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Basilia

9 months ago

HSRPv1 is outdated, no way it meets the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosamond

10 months ago

240 virtual groups? That's a lot!

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

10 months ago

I think VRRPv3 is the better choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Onita

10 months ago

HSRPv2 supports IPv4 and IPv6, so it fits!

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

10 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think HSRPv1 is too limited for this scenario, but I'm not confident about the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bo

11 months ago

HSRPv2 seems familiar, but I can't recall if it supports the required number of virtual groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

11 months ago

I think VRRPv3 might be the right choice since it supports more virtual routers, but I need to double-check the vendor compatibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Man

11 months ago

I remember studying HSRP and VRRP, but I'm not sure which version supports both IPv4 and IPv6 properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonardo

11 months ago

This looks straightforward to me. The requirement for redundant Layer 3 gateway functionality with support for a large number of virtual groups makes VRRP the clear choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rory

11 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The solution needs to support both IPv4 and IPv6, be redundant at Layer 3, and handle at least 240 virtual groups. That points me towards VRRP as the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different FHRP options here. I'll need to review the key features of each one to determine which best meets the stated requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kiera

11 months ago

This seems like a tricky question, but I think I can work through it. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements around IPv4/IPv6 support, redundancy, and the number of virtual groups needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alexis

11 months ago

I'm not too familiar with the FHRP protocols, so I'll need to spend some time reviewing the differences between HSRP and VRRP to make sure I select the right one for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

11 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the logic carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vivan

11 months ago

I'm pretty sure ADMutate is used for polymorphic shell code attacks, but I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Devorah

2 years ago

VRRPV3 is the clear winner. Although, I have to say, the question itself is about as exciting as watching paint dry. Where's the fun in that?

upvoted 0 times

Andrew

2 years ago

I think we can all conclude that VRRPV3 is the right FHRP solution for this data center aggregation layer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lazaro

2 years ago

Definitely, VRRPV3 is the most suitable option for the requirements mentioned.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

2 years ago

I agree, VRRPV3 is the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 years ago

VRRPV3 is the clear winner.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meghann

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think C) VRRPv1 could also be a valid option for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francoise

2 years ago

VRRPV3 is definitely the answer. I'm just curious why they didn't include an option for EIGRP or OSPF. Those would have been too easy, I guess.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

2 years ago

I agree, VRRPV3 is the way to go. It's the only option that meets all the requirements, including the multi-vendor environment.

upvoted 0 times

Glennis

2 years ago

I agree, it's the most suitable option for supporting multiple vendors and providing the required virtual groups.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherrie

2 years ago

VRRPV3 is definitely the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherita

2 years ago

Looks like we need a solution that supports IPv4 and IPv6, redundant Layer 3 gateway, and a minimum of 240 virtual groups. VRRPV3 seems to be the best fit here.

upvoted 0 times