MENU
An engineer Installs a B-Series server in a Cisco UCS chassis that contains a pair of UCS-IOM-2208XP I/O modules. The full bandwidth of the I/O module must be utilized. Which two elements should be used in this environment? (Choose two.)
Suggested Answer: A, E
Get Premium 300-610 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
2208 has 8 uplinks. VIC 1225 only works on C-Series UCS. M81KR has only 2x10G ports. VIC 1280 has 8x10G ports.
23 comments · newest first
MA
Markus
10 months ago
Agreed, the VIC 1225 is outdated for this setup.
DO
Dortha
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure about the twinax cables? Seems like overkill.
PE
Peggie
11 months ago
Four twinax cables should be enough, right?
FE
Felix
11 months ago
I think the M81KR is a solid choice too!
ES
Esteban
11 months ago
Definitely need the Cisco UCS VIC 1280 for full bandwidth.
DO
Dominga
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that the number of cables matters, but I can't decide between eight or four. I wish I had reviewed that section more thoroughly!
AN
Annelle
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question, and I think the M81KR might be relevant here, but I'm not entirely confident.
SO
Socorro
12 months ago
I think the Cisco UCS VIC 1280 is definitely one of the options we need to consider for full bandwidth, but I can't recall the other one.
MI
Micah
12 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of using enough cables to maximize bandwidth, but I'm not sure if it's eight or four twinax cables.
TW
Twana
1 year ago
I'm a little unsure about this one. The question is asking for two elements, so I need to make sure I select the right combination. I think I'll start by eliminating the options that don't seem relevant, then focus on the twinax cable and VIC choices to determine the best pair.
JA
Jade
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is to fully utilize the bandwidth of the I/O modules, so we need four twinax cables from each I/O module to each fabric interconnect. And the Cisco UCS VIC 1280 is the right choice to match that configuration. I'm confident in those two answers.
KR
Kristian
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I'm not sure if I should choose A or B for the twinax cables. And I'm not sure if the VIC 1225 or 1280 is the right choice. I'll need to review the details more carefully.
KE
Kerrie
1 year ago
This seems straightforward - I think the answer is B and E, four twinax cables from each I/O module to each fabric interconnect, and the Cisco UCS VIC 1280.
LI
Lizette
1 year ago
The Cisco UCS VIC 1225 looks like a solid choice, but why settle for just 10 Gbps when you can get 40 Gbps with the VIC 1280? It's like going from a tricycle to a Ferrari. Vroom, vroom!
JA
Jacklyn
1 year ago
I agree with Denae, option A is the correct choice for maximizing bandwidth.
DE
Denae
1 year ago
But option A provides the full bandwidth utilization of the I/O module, which is crucial for performance.
LA
Lashaunda
1 year ago
Four twinax cables? That's just half the potential! I'll take the eight twinax cables option and really unleash the power of these I/O modules. Can't let that bandwidth go to waste, you know.
ST
Stacey
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, using eight twinax cables is the way to go for full utilization.
MA
Marion
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, we need to make sure we're maximizing that bandwidth.
TA
Tatum
1 year ago
Hmm, the Cisco UCS VIC 1280 seems like the way to go. I mean, why settle for less when you can have the full 40 Gbps, right? Gotta go big or go home!
JA
Janey
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option B and option C are the best choices.
GI
Gilbert
1 year ago
Ah, I see. Using eight twinax cables from each I/O module to each fabric interconnect would definitely utilize the full bandwidth of the I/O module. Solid choice!
DE
Denae
1 year ago
I think we should use option A and option E.