Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-515 Exam - Topic 3 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-515 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 3
[All 300-515 Questions]

Which two are characteristics of using a non-MPLS peer-to-peer model over a traditional overlay model? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: E, C

http://etutorials.org/Networking/MPLS+VPN+Architectures/Part+2+MPLS-based+Virtual+Private

+Networks/Chapter+7.+Virtual+Private+Network+VPN+Implementation+Options/Overlay+and+Peer-to-peer

+VPN+Model/

Topic 2, Layer 2 VPNs

by Jesusa at Jan 24, 2026, 10:49 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-515 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Buck
4 days ago
I think one characteristic could be lower latency, but I’m not confident. I remember practicing a question that mentioned efficiency in resource usage too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
10 days ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences. I thought both models had their own advantages, but I can't pinpoint what makes the non-MPLS one stand out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
1 month ago
I remember something about scalability being a factor, but I can't recall if that's specific to non-MPLS. I feel like I've seen similar questions before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
1 month ago
I think one characteristic might be reduced complexity since non-MPLS models can simplify routing. But I'm not entirely sure about the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 month ago
Alright, let me think this through step-by-step. Peer-to-peer is more distributed, so that's one. And it probably has lower latency since there's no central controller. I'll go with those two.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
2 months ago
Ugh, networking questions are the worst. I'm just going to take a shot in the dark on this one and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
2 months ago
I remember discussing this in class. I think peer-to-peer has less overhead and is more scalable than a traditional overlay. But I'm not sure about the other characteristic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
2 months ago
Okay, let me see. I know overlay models use a central controller, so maybe peer-to-peer doesn't have that? And it might be more distributed? I'll have to guess on the second one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the differences between MPLS and peer-to-peer models. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel