Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-515 Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.An organization is running H-VPLS on a network comprising four routers in a hub-and-spoke topology with R1 as the hub An engineer added a new spoke with multiple VCs to the network, and now traffic cannot flow properly How should the engineer update the configuration on R1 to correct the problem?
B) Disable split horizon to allow multiple VCs per spoke
A) Disable spanning tree to allow loops to occur within the hub-and-spoke topology.
C) Disable Cisco Discovery Protocol to allow MPLS to share labels between the designated spokes
D) Disable Cisco Discovery Protocol to allow for neighbor discovery

Cisco 300-515 Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-515 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All 300-515 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

An organization is running H-VPLS on a network comprising four routers in a hub-and-spoke topology with R1 as the hub An engineer added a new spoke with multiple VCs to the network, and now traffic cannot flow properly How should the engineer update the configuration on R1 to correct the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ceola at Jul 29, 2022, 07:28 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-515 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ming
10 months ago
D is unnecessary if you already have neighbor discovery set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
10 months ago
C won't help with label sharing, that's not how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
10 months ago
Surprised that disabling split horizon is even an option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
11 months ago
I disagree, disabling spanning tree seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
11 months ago
B is definitely the way to go for multiple VCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
11 months ago
I feel like disabling CDP might help with neighbor discovery, but I can't recall if that's really necessary for VPLS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think disabling split horizon was the solution there too. It makes sense for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but disabling spanning tree seems risky. I think loops could really mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
11 months ago
I remember something about split horizon causing issues with multiple VCs, so maybe option B is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
11 months ago
Okay, I've got this! The key rules are experience, skills, availability, and capacity. I'm confident I can get this one right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
11 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of aligning project scopes with available resources. Maybe performing a risk assessment would give us a clearer picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question is asking about the account type that is not part of the FX range, so I need to carefully consider each option and eliminate the ones that are within the FX range.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel