MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
Refer to the exhibit. Mid-sized company Z connected two branch offices via a multicast-enabled ISP using the BGP routing protocol. PIM was implemented to support multicast streaming between the branches via MSDP Client A cannot connect to the multicast stream source of company Z. The network engineer ran a debug on the edge of the network as shown. Which action resolves the issue?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium 300-510 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
CA
Carmen
11 months ago
Disagree, I believe enabling Auto-RP will solve it.
TY
Tyisha
11 months ago
Definitely need to enable multicast on both LANs.
HA
Hannah
11 months ago
Surprised that PIM alone isn't enough for this setup!
MA
Matt
11 months ago
I think BSR is a better option here.
KE
Kenneth
12 months ago
Looks like MBGP is the way to go for multicast.
ET
Ettie
12 months ago
I feel like enabling BGP and advertising the subnet could help, but I’m not sure if that directly addresses the multicast issue.
KR
Kristofer
1 year ago
Deploying BSR sounds familiar, but I’m not confident if it applies to this scenario. I need to think about how it interacts with MSDP.
KR
Kris
1 year ago
I think I practiced a similar question where configuring PIM on the interface was the solution, but I can't recall the specifics.
CA
Carma
1 year ago
I remember something about MBGP being important for multicast routing, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice here.
KA
Kasandra
1 year ago
I've seen questions like this before. I believe the issue is with the multicast routing configuration, so I'll focus on options that involve setting up PIM, MBGP, or BSR properly.
LO
Lorrine
1 year ago
Okay, the key seems to be that the multicast stream source can't be reached by the client. I think the solution is likely related to configuring the multicast routing protocols correctly between the branches.
FR
Frederica
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the different routing protocols mentioned. I'll need to make sure I understand the relationship between BGP, PIM, and MSDP before I can decide on the best solution.
TI
Timothy
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky multicast networking question. I'll need to carefully review the exhibit and debug output to determine the root cause.
TH
Thurman
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through. The Stage Plan is the main plan for a project stage, so replacing that would be a significant change. I'm guessing the Project Board would need to approve that, since they have overall responsibility for the project.
LU
Ludivina
2 years ago
Ah, the joys of networking. I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'All of the above' and that the exam doesn't ask me to build a working Rube Goldberg machine as a bonus question.
RE
Rebbecca
2 years ago
Hold up, did you guys even read the question? The exhibit shows the debug output, so the answer is obviously A. Implement MBGP and enable a multicast address family on R2. Duh!
CH
Charlene
2 years ago
I see what you mean now. A makes the most sense based on the information provided.
GA
Gabriele
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. The debug output clearly shows the issue. A is the correct answer.
TY
Tyra
2 years ago
D all the way, baby! Enabling BGP and advertising the subnet on R1 is the only way to go. Clearly, the problem is routing, not multicast.
TA
Tambra
2 years ago
Yeah, D is the way to go. Routing needs to be sorted out first before looking at multicast.
ME
Merilyn
2 years ago
I agree, option D seems like the most logical solution here. It's definitely a routing problem.
RA
Ranee
2 years ago
I think option D is the best choice. Enabling BGP and advertising the subnet on R1 should fix the routing issue.
TE
Teddy
2 years ago
D) Enable the BGP routing protocol and advertise the 10 10.10.0/24 subnet on R1.
HI
Hillary
2 years ago
C) Deploy BSR on routers R1 and R2 and enable multicast on both LAN segments.
MA
Mary
2 years ago
B) Configure the PIM protocol on the Serial 1/1 interface and enable Auto-RP
JE
Jess
2 years ago
A) Implement MBGP and enable a multicast address family on R2
LI
Lisandra
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think B) Configure the PIM protocol on the Serial 1/1 interface and enable Auto-RP could also be a possible solution.
MA
Margarett
2 years ago
Nah, I'm going with C. Deploying BSR on R1 and R2 and enabling multicast on both LAN segments should do the trick. Gotta love those redundant protocols!
TE
Teddy
2 years ago
I'm with User2 on this one. Redundant protocols can definitely help in situations like this.
DA
Dacia
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best solution. Deploying BSR on R1 and R2 and enabling multicast on both LAN segments seems like the right choice.
SH
Shalon
2 years ago
I think option A is the way to go. Implementing MBGP and enabling a multicast address family on R2 should fix the issue.
MO
Mollie
2 years ago
Gerardo: Hmm, you may be onto something there. Redundant protocols can definitely help in situations like this.
GE
Gerardo
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice. Deploying BSR on R1 and R2 and enabling multicast on both LAN segments seems like the right move.
GA
Gail
2 years ago
I think option A is the way to go. Implementing MBGP and enabling a multicast address family on R2 sounds like the solution.
SH
Shawna
2 years ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring PIM on the Serial 1/1 interface and enabling Auto-RP seems like the logical step to resolve the multicast connectivity issue.
JO
Joaquin
2 years ago
I agree, that option seems to be the most appropriate solution in this scenario.
TA
Tanja
2 years ago
I think the answer is B. Configuring PIM on the Serial 1/1 interface and enabling Auto-RP seems like the logical step to resolve the multicast connectivity issue.
DE
Delpha
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Deploy BSR on routers R1 and R2 and enable multicast on both LAN segments.
JE
Jesus
2 years ago
I think the answer is A) Implement MBGP and enable a multicast address family on R2.