Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 5 Question 71 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. Users at the branch office on R1 reported issue with an application at the home office on R4. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer determined thatThe branch-office users can connect to the home office.The IS-IS adjacencies between R1 and R2 and R1 and the branch office are up.Traffic from R1 to the R2 10.20.1.0/24 network is moving normally.The application at the home office is experiencing packet drops on the connection to the Branch, and R3 cannot reach the R1 172.16.10.0/24 network.Which action resolves the issues?
C) Redistribute static connected routes in IS-IS on router R4.
A) Redistribute static connected routes in IS-IS on router RI.
B) Configure the IS-IS core instance on the RI GigabitEthernet0/3 interface.
D) Configure the IS-IS core instance on the R2 GigabitEthernet0/1 interface.

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 5 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 5
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Users at the branch office on R1 reported issue with an application at the home office on R4. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer determined that

The branch-office users can connect to the home office.

The IS-IS adjacencies between R1 and R2 and R1 and the branch office are up.

Traffic from R1 to the R2 10.20.1.0/24 network is moving normally.

The application at the home office is experiencing packet drops on the connection to the Branch, and R3 cannot reach the R1 172.16.10.0/24 network.

Which action resolves the issues?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Jeff
9 months ago
Not sure if this is the right fix, feels off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
10 months ago
Wait, why would R2's interface matter here?
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
10 months ago
I think it's R4 that needs the static routes redistributed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aimee
10 months ago
Totally agree, sounds like a routing issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
10 months ago
R1 can connect to the home office, but there's packet loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
11 months ago
I keep thinking about how adjacencies being up doesn't always mean traffic flows correctly. Maybe we need to check the configuration on R2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
11 months ago
I feel like the issue might be with R4, but I can't recall if redistributing routes there would actually fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
11 months ago
I remember a similar question where configuring the IS-IS instance on the correct interface was key. Could it be option B or D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think redistributing static routes might help with the packet drops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
11 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I'm just going to go with option A and validate the hashes. That should give me a good starting point to investigate further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify which capabilities the Storage Workload Management pattern provides, like distributing workloads across multiple devices and using grouping to balance the data distribution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
11 months ago
My memory is fuzzy, but I believe head-end replication might work well with VXLAN. It feels like the right direction, but I'd have to double-check the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding what "remediation options" refers to in the context of software license management. Based on the options provided, it seems like the answer is likely B - creating allocations to address any unlicensed installations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
11 months ago
I definitely remember that the highest class server supports a lot, but was it 120? I just can't recall the exact figure from my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
1 year ago
Wait, isn't option B about configuring the IS-IS core instance on the R1 interface? That could be the solution if the issue is with the IS-IS adjacency.
upvoted 0 times
Virgie
1 year ago
That's a good point. If the issue is with the static connected routes, redistributing them in IS-IS on router R1 could indeed be the right action to take.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunshine
1 year ago
But what if the problem is related to the static connected routes? Would redistributing static connected routes in IS-IS on router R1 be a better solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 year ago
Yes, you are correct. Configuring the IS-IS core instance on the R1 interface could help resolve the issue with the IS-IS adjacency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamra
1 year ago
Haha, this reminds me of that time I accidentally configured the wrong interface on a router. Classic network troubleshooting!
upvoted 0 times
Paris
1 year ago
User 4: Yeah, that might resolve the packet drops issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe redistributing static connected routes in IS-IS could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
1 year ago
User 2: It happens to the best of us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
1 year ago
User 1: I once configured the wrong interface on a router too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
1 year ago
User 4: Yeah, that might resolve the packet drops issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
1 year ago
User 3: Maybe redistributing static connected routes in IS-IS could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 year ago
User 2: It happens to the best of us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 year ago
User 1: I once configured the wrong interface on a router too.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lezlie
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards option C - redistributing static connected routes on R4. That could help fix the packet drops on the connection to the branch office.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense. Thanks for sharing your opinion, Virgie.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) Configure the IS-IS core instance on the R1 GigabitEthernet0/3 interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Redistribute static connected routes in IS-IS on router R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
The question mentions that the IS-IS adjacencies between R1 and R2 are up, so that can't be the issue. I think it might have something to do with the R1 172.16.10.0/24 network not being reachable from R3.
upvoted 0 times
Dudley
1 year ago
B) Configure the IS-IS core instance on the RI GigabitEthernet0/3 interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
1 year ago
A) Redistribute static connected routes in IS-IS on router RI.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leatha
1 year ago
Why do you think B is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Page
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
1 year ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I'm not sure if I should redistribute static connected routes on R1 or R4. Maybe the problem is with the IS-IS adjacency between R1 and R2?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 year ago
I think the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel