MENU
Refer to the exhibit.
An engineer is troubleshooting an OSPF issue. Router 1 has a neighbor relationship with
router 2. Only router 1 classful EIGRP routes can be seen on router 2. In order for all EIGRP routes to be redistributed correctly, which action should be taken?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 300-510 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
29 comments · newest first
CL
Cletus
10 months ago
D seems off, metric-type 1 isn't necessary for this scenario.
KA
Katie
10 months ago
C doesn't make sense here, OSPF metrics aren't relevant for EIGRP.
HA
Harley
11 months ago
Wait, are we really saying subnets is the key? That’s unexpected!
CA
Catalina
11 months ago
I think B is a misunderstanding; the AS number is needed.
SE
Serita
11 months ago
A is definitely the right choice for full EIGRP route redistribution.
ST
Staci
11 months ago
I feel like the "ospf-metric" keyword might be important too, but I can't remember how it fits into the redistribution process.
MO
Monroe
11 months ago
I thought removing the AS number could affect the redistribution, but I can't recall if that's the right approach here.
VA
Valene
12 months ago
This question feels familiar; I think we practiced a similar one where the "metric-type" was crucial for OSPF.
BR
Brynn
12 months ago
I remember something about needing the "subnets" keyword for EIGRP redistribution, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the only requirement.
LI
Lindy
1 year ago
I'm pretty confident this is an A. The "subnets" keyword is required to ensure all EIGRP routes, including subnetted routes, get redistributed into OSPF on Router 2.
CL
Claribel
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is including the "subnets" keyword in the redistribution command on Router 1 so that all EIGRP routes, including subnets, get redistributed correctly.
FE
Felix
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the specifics of how EIGRP routes are redistributed into OSPF. I'll need to double-check the configuration commands to make sure I understand the right approach.
FR
France
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky OSPF and EIGRP redistribution question. I'll need to carefully review the details and think through the options.
CU
Curt
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the engineer is scratching their head trying to figure this one out. OSPF and EIGRP can be a real headache sometimes!
AR
Aretha
1 year ago
Benton: Let's see, maybe we can figure it out together.
LA
Latricia
1 year ago
User 3: No, I believe it's D) Router 1 must have the keyword metric-type 1 included in the redistribution command.
BE
Benton
1 year ago
User 2: I think the answer is A) Router 1 must have the keyword subnets included in the redistribution command.
JE
Jesusa
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, troubleshooting OSPF and EIGRP can be tricky.
AL
Alica
1 year ago
B is the way to go. Removing the AS number will allow all EIGRP routes to be redistributed without any issues.
MA
Margery
1 year ago
I think D is the right answer. Specifying the metric-type 1 will ensure the EIGRP routes are redistributed correctly into OSPF.
IZ
Izetta
1 year ago
I think D is more specific to the EIGRP routes, so it should be the right choice.
GR
Graham
1 year ago
But what about option A? Including the subnets keyword might also be necessary for proper redistribution.
GI
Gianna
1 year ago
I agree, D is the correct answer. It specifies the metric-type for redistribution.
AN
Anglea
2 years ago
The answer is clearly A. The 'subnets' keyword is required to redistribute EIGRP subnetted routes.
PR
Precious
1 year ago
Yes, without the 'subnets' keyword, only classful EIGRP routes will be redistributed.
LE
Leota
1 year ago
I agree, the 'subnets' keyword is necessary for redistributing EIGRP subnetted routes.
SH
Sharan
2 years ago
Why do you think D is the correct answer?
CH
Chun
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D.
SH
Sharan
2 years ago
I think the answer is A.