Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 3 Question 109 Discussion

Posted by Tonette on Apr 30, 2025 at 06:24 AM

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit Networks 172.16.31.0/24 and 172 16 30.0/24 are advertised in area 34. and network 172.22 10.0/24 is advertised in area 0. A recent security review discovered that users connected to routers R1 and R2 have been making unauthorized access to an application running on network 172 16 31 0/24 An engineer determined that routers R1 and R2 are receiving updates for network 17 16 31 0/24 Which action resolves the issue?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
MA
Marya 10 months ago
Wait, why only R3? That seems risky.
SH
Shakira 10 months ago
Definitely agree, R1 and R2 need that filtering!
IL
Iluminada 10 months ago
I think route filtering on R3 and R4 is the way to go.
CY
Cyndy 11 months ago
Applying filtering on R4 alone won't solve the issue.
SH
Shay 11 months ago
I’m surprised this wasn’t caught earlier!
SH
Sherita 11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about whether R4 alone would be enough. I think I need to double-check how route updates work in this scenario.
RA
Rana 11 months ago
I feel like I read that filtering should be done on the routers directly connected to the affected networks, so maybe R1 and R2?
NO
Novella 11 months ago
This question seems similar to one we practiced where we had to filter routes to prevent unauthorized access. I think applying it on R3 might be the right move.
FA
Fatima 12 months ago
I remember something about route filtering, but I'm not sure if it should be applied to both R3 and R4 or just one of them.
CH
Chuck 12 months ago
Ah, I see. The key here is to identify the source of the unauthorized access and apply the filtering at the appropriate routers. I'll need to carefully consider the options and make sure I understand the implications of each before selecting the best answer.
FA
Fabiola 1 year ago
Based on the information provided, I think the best solution is to apply route filtering on routers R3 and R4. That way, we can prevent the unauthorized access from the users connected to R1 and R2 without disrupting the legitimate routing updates.
YO
Yolando 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused here. The question mentions networks in different areas, so I'll need to understand the OSPF area structure and how that affects the routing updates. Maybe I should start by drawing out the network diagram to visualize the connections.
WI
Winifred 1 year ago
Okay, let's see. The issue is with unauthorized access to the 172.16.31.0/24 network, and the routers R1 and R2 are receiving updates for that network. I think the solution might involve applying route filtering on those routers.
GE
Gerardo 1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully analyze the network topology and routing information to determine the best approach.
KA
Kanisha 1 year ago
Haha, I bet the engineer who figured this out is feeling pretty proud of themselves. Way to go, detective!
EL
Elroy 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
B) That should prevent unauthorized access to the application.
ED
Edward 1 year ago
↳ replying to Kanisha
A) Apply route filtering on routers R3 and R4.
RO
Rozella 1 year ago
I believe option C) Apply route filtering on routers R1 and R2 could also work to resolve the issue.
LA
Lamonica 1 year ago
Wait, wait, wait... Isn't this the same problem as the one with the 'unauthorized access' issue in the IT department last year? I swear I've seen this before!
AL
Alease 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
Agreed, let's implement the route filtering on those routers.
CA
Cassandra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
That makes sense, we need to restrict the updates they are receiving.
EL
Elvera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
I think we need to apply route filtering on routers R1 and R2 to resolve this.
TA
Tamie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lamonica
Yes, it does seem similar to the issue we had last year.
MA
Marnie 1 year ago
Hmm, I thought the solution would be to apply route filtering on all the routers, just to be safe. Better safe than sorry, right?
MA
Madonna 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marnie
But the correct action is to apply route filtering on routers R3 and R4.
RO
Roxane 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marnie
I agree, better to be safe than sorry.
CA
Carman 1 year ago
↳ replying to Marnie
I think applying route filtering on all routers would be a good idea.
AR
Arlene 1 year ago
I agree with Glynda, applying route filtering on both routers R3 and R4 makes sense.
GL
Glynda 1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Apply route filtering on routers R3 and R4.
AR
Aron 1 year ago
The correct answer is C. Apply route filtering on routers R1 and R2 to prevent unauthorized access to the 172.16.31.0/24 network.
BO
Bok 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aron
Let's make sure to implement it as soon as possible.
AD
Adell 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aron
Agreed, that will prevent unauthorized access to the network.
HE
Helene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Aron
We need to apply route filtering on routers R1 and R2 to fix the issue.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel