Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 83 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.All backbone interfaces on the network are in VRF_MPLS and ip rsvp signalling hello is preconfigured on all MPLS routers in the network. After router R2 is upgraded and its configuration restored from backup. LSP signaled via RSVP that the tunnel from R1 had been tom down The network engineer confirmed IP reachability line the backbone network Which action must the engineer take to fix the issue?
C) Configure ip rsvp signalling hello refresh interval 20 under the interface GiO/0 configuration on R1.
A) Configure ip rsvp udp neighbor 172.16.10.1 vrf VRFMPLS under the global configuration on R2.
B) Configure ip rsvp listener outbound reply 172.16.10.1 vrf VRF_MPLS under the global configuration on R2.
D) Configure ip rsvp udp-multicasts 172.16.10.2 vrf VRFMPLS under the interface GiO/0 configuration on R1

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

All backbone interfaces on the network are in VRF_MPLS and ip rsvp signalling hello is preconfigured on all MPLS routers in the network. After router R2 is upgraded and its configuration restored from backup. LSP signaled via RSVP that the tunnel from R1 had been tom down The network engineer confirmed IP reachability line the backbone network Which action must the engineer take to fix the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nichelle at Apr 12, 2024, 06:04 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hillary
9 months ago
This seems too easy, something feels off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antione
9 months ago
Wait, why would we need to configure anything on R1?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 months ago
Definitely agree with A, it's straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfreda
10 months ago
I think B could also work, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
10 months ago
Looks like A is the right move here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
I feel like the multicast configuration could also be relevant here, but I’m not entirely confident about which option is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
11 months ago
I think I might have seen a question where adjusting the hello refresh interval helped with LSP issues, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrie
11 months ago
This question feels similar to one we practiced where we had to troubleshoot RSVP issues. I think configuring the UDP neighbor might be the right move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
11 months ago
I remember something about configuring RSVP neighbors, but I'm not sure if it's the UDP neighbor or the listener reply that we need to set up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
11 months ago
I've seen questions like this before, and the key is to focus on the specific problem statement. Since the RSVP tunnel was torn down, the solution is likely related to re-establishing the RSVP signaling. I think option A looks like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
11 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with RSVP configuration, so I'll need to review the options carefully and try to match them to the details provided in the question. I may need to do some additional research to feel confident in my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through step-by-step. The question states that IP reachability is confirmed, so the issue is likely related to the RSVP signaling. Based on that, I'm leaning towards option B as the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the details in the question. It mentions an RSVP tunnel being torn down, but doesn't provide much context on the network topology or the specific problem. I'll need to carefully read through the options to see which one best fits the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
11 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to identify the issue and then determine the appropriate configuration change to address it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The scenario talks about an offer letter and e-signature, so I'm not sure if it's testing my knowledge of confidentiality, integrity, or non-repudiation. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
11 months ago
I'm feeling a bit unsure about when to defer a variance. I seem to recall similar practice questions, but the details are fuzzy. Was it tied to certain thresholds?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
11 months ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think carefully about the requirements for a MID Server service account on Windows.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elly
1 year ago
I'm pretty sure the right answer is Option B. Configuring the ip rsvp listener on R2 should do the trick. Anything else would be a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
1 year ago
Option C is a bit off-topic. Adjusting the RSVP hello refresh interval on R1 won't help with the issue on R2.
upvoted 0 times
Cora
1 year ago
D) Configure ip rsvp udp-multicasts 172.16.10.2 vrf VRFMPLS under the interface GiO/0 configuration on R1
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
1 year ago
B) Configure ip rsvp listener outbound reply 172.16.10.1 vrf VRF_MPLS under the global configuration on R2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
1 year ago
A) Configure ip rsvp udp neighbor 172.16.10.1 vrf VRFMPLS under the global configuration on R2.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Millie
1 year ago
Haha, Option D is just plain silly. Configuring ip rsvp udp-multicasts on the interface? Really?
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
1 year ago
I think Option A is the way to go. Configuring the ip rsvp udp neighbor on R2 should help re-establish the RSVP signaling.
upvoted 0 times
Jettie
1 year ago
User3: Agreed, that seems like the best solution to fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
1 year ago
User2: Yeah, configuring the ip rsvp udp neighbor on R2 should help re-establish the RSVP signaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 year ago
User1: I think Option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wei
1 year ago
Option B seems like the correct choice. The engineer needs to configure ip rsvp listener on the router to fix the RSVP tunnel issue.
upvoted 0 times
Alise
1 year ago
User 3: Agreed, that should fix the RSVP tunnel issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, the engineer should configure ip rsvp listener on the router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
1 year ago
User 1: I think option B is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A is the best choice because it directly addresses the issue with R2's configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Configure ip rsvp udp-multicasts 172.16.10.2 vrf VRFMPLS under the interface GiO/0 configuration on R1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Configure ip rsvp udp neighbor 172.16.10.1 vrf VRFMPLS under the global configuration on R2.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel