Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

The ISP_A network is configured with PIMv2 with sparse mode. The engineering team at ISP_A must implement multicast support following RFC 5059 in the network. The RP priority will be 0, and the solution must require limited supervision from the operations team. Which action must the team take to meet the requirements?
C) Implement bootstrap router in the network core.
A) Implement Auto-RP on the candidate RP and the mapping agent only.
B) Implement Static RP across all routers in the network.
D) Implement Anycast-RP on edge routers only.

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

The ISP_A network is configured with PIMv2 with sparse mode. The engineering team at ISP_A must implement multicast support following RFC 5059 in the network. The RP priority will be 0, and the solution must require limited supervision from the operations team. Which action must the team take to meet the requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Adell at Dec 25, 2023, 10:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Galen
9 months ago
Wait, why would they set RP priority to 0? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
10 months ago
I agree, Static RP is simpler and fits the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rossana
10 months ago
Anycast-RP sounds interesting, but is it really necessary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
10 months ago
Auto-RP could work, but it might need more supervision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
10 months ago
I think Static RP is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
Anycast-RP seems like a good option for edge routers, but I’m not confident if it aligns with the RFC requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kip
11 months ago
I vaguely recall something about bootstrap routers being used for multicast, but I can't remember the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
11 months ago
I think Static RP might be too manual for what they want, but it does sound familiar from practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
11 months ago
I remember studying about Auto-RP, but I'm not sure if it's the best fit for limited supervision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. The options seem to cover different multicast routing protocols, and I'm not confident I fully understand the differences between them. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerry
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy here. Since the RP priority will be 0, I think implementing Static RP across all routers in the network (option B) would be the best approach to meet the limited supervision requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions implementing multicast support following RFC 5059, but none of the options seem to directly address that. I'll need to review the RFC to make sure I understand the requirements fully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the key is implementing a solution that requires limited supervision from the operations team, so I'm leaning towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliot
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident that Class and Method Expression are not guaranteed to be thread-safe, but I'm not sure about the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
11 months ago
I think the Story played in Kiosk mode with a loop would be the best option here. It's a quick and easy way to create an engaging information panel with minimal effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand exactly what it's asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
11 months ago
I think the user's inactivity after deletion needs to be handled in IDM, but I'm not completely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
2 years ago
What about Anycast-RP? That could work too, right? It would provide redundancy and still be a relatively hands-off approach for the ops team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree with Chan. Static RP is probably the way to go here. It's the most straightforward solution and meets the requirement of limited supervision from the ops team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
2 years ago
Haha, yeah, Anycast-RP is like bringing a bazooka to a knife fight. Let's keep it simple, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
2 years ago
Hmm, good point Tom. Anycast-RP could be an option, but it might be overkill for this scenario. Static RP just seems like the simplest and most direct solution.
upvoted 0 times
Kristofer
2 years ago
Great, I'll start working on implementing Static RP across all routers in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
2 years ago
Yes, let's go with option B for simplicity and limited supervision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
2 years ago
So, are we all agreeing on implementing Static RP then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharmaine
2 years ago
That's true, we need a solution that requires minimal intervention from the operations team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
2 years ago
I see your point, but Anycast-RP might be too complex for limited supervision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
2 years ago
But shouldn't we consider Anycast-RP as well for better scalability?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
2 years ago
I think we should go with option B and implement Static RP.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel