Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. This network is deployed with all connected links configured to run IS-IS. The routing protocol is enacted globally on each router, and the network engineer expects full routing Information to be shared among all routers. R5 is receiving routes from R4 but is missing routes from R1. Which action corrects the issue so that all routes are shared among the routers?
A) Configure all routers to reside in toe area.
B) Configure RI and RS as Level 1'Level 2
C) Configure R3 as a Level 2 we.
D) Configure R5 in the same as RI,

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 2 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 2
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. This network is deployed with all connected links configured to run IS-IS. The routing protocol is enacted globally on each router, and the network engineer expects full routing Information to be shared among all routers. R5 is receiving routes from R4 but is missing routes from R1. Which action corrects the issue so that all routes are shared among the routers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Stevie at Nov 20, 2022, 08:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karima
10 months ago
Option B is interesting, but not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
10 months ago
Wait, can R5 really receive routes from R1 like that? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
10 months ago
Definitely agree with option A, that should fix it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
11 months ago
I think configuring R3 as Level 2 makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
All routers need to be in the same area for full route sharing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armando
11 months ago
I vaguely recall that configuring routers as Level 1 and Level 2 can help with route sharing. Option B sounds familiar, but I’m not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
11 months ago
I feel like R5 missing routes from R1 could be due to area misconfigurations. I might lean towards option A, but I need to double-check my notes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherill
11 months ago
This seems similar to a practice question where we had to configure levels. I think B might be the right choice, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
11 months ago
I remember something about IS-IS areas, but I'm not sure if all routers need to be in the same area for full routing info.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The question is asking about the pre-existing conditions, so I need to focus on that part of the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
11 months ago
Okay, I've got it! Option C is the right answer. You bundle the X and Y array pairs into two clusters and then create an array of those two clusters. That's how you get the two plots on the XY Graph.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
11 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking if the traffic limiting policy feature only supports the number of connections initiated or received, so I'll carefully read the options and select the one that best matches the description.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel