Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 15 Question 72 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is troubleshooting a network routing issue on this IS-IS network situated at the customer's regional hub. Router 2 that runs Cisco IOS XR Software cannot see the network 10.1.1.0/24 on router 1. The Layer 2 encapsulations are correct. The ARP connectivity for the Ethernet interface that runs IS-IS is working. Which action resolves the issue?
D) Under the router isis command on router 2. change is-type level-1 to is-type level-2
A) On router 1, remove the CISCOLIVE keyword after the Ip router Isis command under interface GigabitEthernet0/2.
B) Under the router isis command on router 1. change is-type level-1 to is-type level-2
C) On router 1. add the CISCOLIVE keyword after the Ip router isis command under interface GigabitEthernet0/3.

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 15 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 15
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is troubleshooting a network routing issue on this IS-IS network situated at the customer's regional hub. Router 2 that runs Cisco IOS XR Software cannot see the network 10.1.1.0/24 on router 1. The Layer 2 encapsulations are correct. The ARP connectivity for the Ethernet interface that runs IS-IS is working. Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lenna at Aug 04, 2023, 05:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Dorothea
9 months ago
I’ve seen this before, definitely check the IS-IS settings!
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure that's the only issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shannon
10 months ago
I think changing to level-2 on router 1 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
10 months ago
Totally agree, that's the fix!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
10 months ago
Router 1 needs the CISCOLIVE keyword removed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edda
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m not entirely confident about the level types. It feels like a tricky situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
11 months ago
I feel like the issue might be related to the interface settings, but I can't recall if it's GigabitEthernet0/2 or 0/3 that needs the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verdell
11 months ago
I think I practiced a similar question where changing the IS-IS type was the key. Maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
11 months ago
I remember something about the CISCOLIVE keyword, but I'm not sure if it should be added or removed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexis
11 months ago
I've got this! The answer is B, chain of custody. Making sure the evidence is properly handled and accounted for from seizure to presentation in court is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrinne
11 months ago
I remember practicing something similar where we had to identify handlers, and I feel like the Operator handler might be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know NAT is used for IP address translation, but I'm not confident that's the right answer here. I'll have to think it through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The legs of the Fishbone represent the main categories of potential defect sources, like materials, equipment, people, methods, etc. And then along those legs, we list out the specific ways each of those could introduce defects. Sounds straightforward enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
11 months ago
Staff potential sounds like it would play a part in the internal analysis phase, but I'm not sure how it compares with other options like turnover or shortages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
1 year ago
Wait, there's a CISCOLIVE keyword? Is this a Cisco Live-themed exam? I'm already confused, and I haven't even started the test!
upvoted 0 times
Earlean
1 year ago
Alayna: Good point. Let's not get sidetracked by the keywords.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
1 year ago
User 2: I think it's just a distraction. We need to focus on the actual troubleshooting steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
1 year ago
User 1: Yeah, I saw that too. What's up with the CISCOLIVE keyword?
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Peggie
1 year ago
I'm going with option D. Changing the IS-type on Router 2 seems like the most straightforward solution to this routing issue.
upvoted 0 times
Iesha
1 year ago
User 3: Agreed, let's go with option D then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, changing the IS-type on Router 2 should fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 year ago
User 1: I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the engineer forgot to turn it off and on again! Seriously though, the key is in the IS-IS configuration, not the Layer 2 encapsulation.
upvoted 0 times
Marnie
1 year ago
Santos: Yeah, changing the IS-IS level type could resolve the routing issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hannah
1 year ago
User 3: Option B seems like the right choice to fix the IS-IS configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
User 2: I don't think a reboot will help in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
1 year ago
User 1: Maybe a simple reboot would do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
1 year ago
User 4: Yeah, changing the IS-IS level type might fix the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 year ago
User 3: Option B looks like the right choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
1 year ago
User 2: I don't think that's the issue. It's probably something in the IS-IS configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
1 year ago
User 1: Maybe they should try restarting the routers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Novella
1 year ago
I think the CISCOLIVE keyword is the culprit here. Removing it from the interface on Router 1 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
The issue seems to be related to the IS-IS configuration on Router 2. Changing the IS-type from level-1 to level-2 on Router 2 should resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
1 year ago
But changing the IS-IS level on router 1 seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
1 year ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel