Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 12 Question 54 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Routers RA and RB are IS-IS peers configured for NSF but router RC is an IS-IS peer without NSF capability If RA undergoes processor switchover what is the effect on the network environment?
C) All peer relationships remain up, but the link-state database is rebuilt on each device
A) If RC is operating without the Cisco configuration option all three routers tear down their peering relationships and re-establish peering
B) All peer relationships remain up and the link-state database is unchanged
D) If RC is operating without the Cisco configuration option only 2 routers tear down their peering relationships and re-establish peering

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 12 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 12
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Routers RA and RB are IS-IS peers configured for NSF but router RC is an IS-IS peer without NSF capability If RA undergoes processor switchover what is the effect on the network environment?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Valentine at Jul 25, 2022, 06:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ellsworth
10 months ago
I thought NSF would keep things stable, but guess not!
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
10 months ago
D sounds plausible, but I'm not sure about the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
10 months ago
Wait, how can B be true? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
11 months ago
Totally agree, A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
I think the answer is A. RC will cause all to tear down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
11 months ago
I believe that if RA goes down, RC will definitely affect the peering, but I’m torn between options A and D. I need to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the specifics of NSF. I thought that if one router doesn’t support it, the others might still hold their sessions, but I can't recall clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the behavior of routers during a switchover was tested. I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like option A could be correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
11 months ago
I think I remember that when NSF is involved, it helps maintain peer relationships, but since RC doesn't support it, things might get tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
11 months ago
I'm leaning towards the hunt pilot option. It seems like the right place to manage those numbers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nilsa
11 months ago
Sending the same message to everyone feels like the wrong choice; we definitely talked about that in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. I'm a bit confused about how the number of methods created would differ between the two options. I'll need to think this through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
11 months ago
I remember a question about whether written reports need to be distributed to governance. I think it was something like this, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel