Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 11 Question 80 Discussion

Refer to the exhibit.Refer to the exhibit. Unified MPLS is implemented on this network to provide end-to-end services A network engineer noticed that R3 is failing to receive labels from R1 However, R2 is receiving labels from R1 R3 can ping R1 normally Which action resolves the issue?
B) Add the send-label keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3.
A) Add the cdp run command to the link configuration between R1 and R3.
C) Configure R1 to run Unified MPLS on both interfaces.
D) Disable mpls Ip on the link between R1 and R3

Cisco 300-510 Exam - Topic 11 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-510 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 11
[All 300-510 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Unified MPLS is implemented on this network to provide end-to-end services A network engineer noticed that R3 is failing to receive labels from R1 However, R2 is receiving labels from R1 R3 can ping R1 normally Which action resolves the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Stephaine at Feb 14, 2024, 12:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-510 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karol
8 months ago
Wait, why is R3 pinging R1 fine but not getting labels? Seems odd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
9 months ago
No way, D would just make things worse!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carylon
9 months ago
I think C might be the answer, but not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dianne
9 months ago
Definitely B, adding the send-label keyword should fix it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
9 months ago
R3 isn't getting labels from R1, but R2 is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorsey
9 months ago
Hmm, disabling MPLS IP on the link between R1 and R3 seems like it could work, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
10 months ago
Based on the details, I think the solution might be to add the "send-label" keyword to the R1 neighbor statement for R3. That should resolve the label distribution issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
10 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the exhibit. Is there any additional information we can use to determine the root cause of the problem?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
10 months ago
Okay, let's see here. R3 is not receiving labels from R1, but R2 is. That's the key issue we need to address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
10 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky MPLS question. I'll need to carefully analyze the information provided and think through the possible solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kizzy
11 months ago
Disabling mpls ip on the link seems counterintuitive, so I doubt option D is correct. I feel like R1 needs to send labels to R3 somehow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakisha
11 months ago
Adding the cdp run command seems off to me; I don't think that's related to label distribution. I might lean towards option B instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
11 months ago
I think I saw a similar question where we had to enable MPLS on both interfaces. It might be related to option C, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
11 months ago
I remember something about the send-label keyword being important for label distribution, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefan
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the different phases of the incident handling process. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Is "US" the same as "USA"? I'm not sure if option C would also be valid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
11 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is A, netfront, since that's the network driver used for para-virtualized drivers in a hardware virtualized guest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
2 years ago
I'm inclined to choose option C. Configuring R1 to run Unified MPLS on both interfaces might be the solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
2 years ago
But if we disable MPLS IP, wouldn't that impact other parts of the network as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
2 years ago
I don't agree with that. I believe the correct answer is D. We should disable MPLS IP on the link between R1 and R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
2 years ago
I think the answer is B. Adding the send-label keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3 should resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 years ago
That's a good point, Nydia. I was also considering that option. It makes sense that we need to explicitly tell R1 to send labels to R3, since it's not happening automatically.
upvoted 0 times
Queenie
2 years ago
Sounds like a plan. Let's go ahead and implement the fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
2 years ago
After that, we can verify if R3 is now receiving the labels correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 years ago
Great, let's make that configuration change on R1 then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
2 years ago
Once that change is made, R3 should start receiving labels properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
2 years ago
I agree. R1 needs to be explicitly configured to send labels to R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
2 years ago
That should definitely do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
2 years ago
B) Add the send-label keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nydia
2 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B - adding the 'send-label' keyword in the R1 neighbor statement for R3. That seems like it could be the missing piece to get the labels flowing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 years ago
Yeah, I agree. It's strange that R3 can ping R1 normally, but not receive the labels. The question is asking about the action to resolve the issue, so we need to carefully consider the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
2 years ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'm not sure why R3 is not receiving labels from R1, but it's good that R2 is getting them. Maybe there's something specific about the configuration between R1 and R3 that's causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel