Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

What are two characteristics of synchronous calls to APIs? (Choose two.)
A) They can be used only with certain programming languages.
B) They make your application less portable, so asynchronous calls are preferred.
C) They can add perceived latency to your application if data is not received.
D) They block until a response is returned from the servers.
E) They do not block while waiting for the API to be processed.

Cisco 300-435 Exam - Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-435 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 1
[All 300-435 Questions]

What are two characteristics of synchronous calls to APIs? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Eladia at Apr 25, 2023, 07:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-435 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Malissa
10 months ago
Are they really only for certain languages? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joaquin
10 months ago
Yeah, perceived latency is a big issue with these calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
Wait, I thought they were more portable?
upvoted 0 times
...
Renea
11 months ago
Totally agree, synchronous calls can slow things down!
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
11 months ago
They block until a response is returned from the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
11 months ago
I’m pretty sure synchronous calls do block while waiting for a response, so D seems like a safe choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
11 months ago
I feel like synchronous calls are less portable, which makes option B sound right, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
11 months ago
I remember something about latency, so option C might be correct too, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
11 months ago
I think synchronous calls block the execution until a response is received, so maybe option D is one of the answers?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
11 months ago
I think this question is asking about how Twistlock provides security for running containers and services. The options mention things like restricting network access, quarantining containers, patching vulnerabilities, and building a whitelist security model. I'll need to carefully read through each option to determine which one best describes Twistlock's runtime security approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about SSL/TLS, which uses digital certificates to secure communications over the internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. Do we need to create a separate Feedback object, or can we just use the Account object? I'm not sure if the global action or object-specific action is the better approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 year ago
Synchronous calls, eh? Sounds like a real 'sync' or swim situation! But seriously, C and D are the way to go. Blocking is the name of the game, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
1 year ago
Synchronous calls are like waiting in line at the DMV - it may be slow, but at least you know where you stand. C and D are the clear winners here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 year ago
Haha, E is just plain wrong. Synchronous calls are all about blocking until you get a response. I'm going with C and D, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Carey
1 year ago
Synchronous calls are all about waiting for a response, so C and D make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
1 year ago
Yeah, C and D are the correct characteristics. They can add latency and block until a response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 year ago
User 3: Synchronous calls can add perceived latency if data is not received, and they block until a response is returned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
1 year ago
I agree, E is definitely wrong. Synchronous calls do block until a response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, I think C and D are the correct characteristics for synchronous calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, E is definitely wrong. Synchronous calls block until a response is returned.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about B. Synchronous calls might not be the most portable, but that doesn't mean we should avoid them entirely. I'd say C and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Emily
1 year ago
Yes, C and D are key factors to consider when using synchronous calls to APIs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 year ago
B is not entirely accurate, synchronous calls can still be useful in certain situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 year ago
I agree, C and D are important characteristics of synchronous calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jacquline
1 year ago
Synchronous calls can be a pain, but at least they're straightforward. I'd go with C and D - that's the classic synchronous behavior, right?
upvoted 0 times
Mike
1 year ago
I think C and D are the right choices too. Synchronous calls can definitely add latency to an application.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 year ago
I agree, synchronous calls can be easier to understand. And yes, C and D are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ricarda
1 year ago
But asynchronous calls are preferred because they do not block while waiting for the API to be processed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
1 year ago
I agree, synchronous calls block until a response is returned from the servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
1 year ago
I think synchronous calls can add perceived latency to the application.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel