Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 7 Question 41 Discussion

A shopping center uses AireOS controllers with Cisco Wave 2 APs. A separate WLAN named Guest-012345678-WLAN is used for guest wireless clients. Management needs location analytics to determine popular areas. CMX must track only associated clients. What must be selected on the CMX server settings?
A) Exclude probing clients and C) Enable Locally Administered MAC Filtering
B) Duty Cycle Cutoff
D) Enable Location MAC Filtering

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 7 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 7
[All 300-430 Questions]

A shopping center uses AireOS controllers with Cisco Wave 2 APs. A separate WLAN named Guest-012345678-WLAN is used for guest wireless clients. Management needs location analytics to determine popular areas. CMX must track only associated clients. What must be selected on the CMX server settings?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Vanesa
10 months ago
Why would we want to exclude probing clients? That seems odd!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
10 months ago
I think B might be useful too, but A seems more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure A is the best option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Xenia
11 months ago
Totally agree, A is the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
11 months ago
Gotta go with A, exclude probing clients for accurate tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I remember there were nuances about how probing clients can affect analytics. It’s a bit confusing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Phung
11 months ago
I feel like we discussed the duty cycle cutoff in class, but I can't recall how it ties into location analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lino
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about MAC filtering being important for tracking. Could it be related to option D?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
11 months ago
I think we need to exclude probing clients to focus only on those that are actually connected. That sounds familiar from our practice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
I'm a little confused by this question. The options mention the IVR Server, Web Server, and IVR Server client, but I'm not sure how those fit into the Behind the Switch architecture. I'll have to review my materials on that configuration to try to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The Splunk CIM has a lot of different components, and I want to make sure I don't mix them up. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
11 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the rules around charitable deductions and how they interact with estate taxes. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. I'll have to re-read the question and think about which one best fits the description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
1 year ago
Wow, this question is so easy, it's almost laughable. Excluding probing clients is the way to go, no doubt about it. It's like they're not even trying to trick us here.
upvoted 0 times
Alaine
1 year ago
Definitely, just stick with the obvious answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verda
1 year ago
Yeah, it's a straightforward question. No need to overthink it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
1 year ago
I agree, excluding probing clients is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Craig
1 year ago
Ah, the classic 'exclude probing clients' trick. Always works like a charm. I'm feeling good about this one.
upvoted 0 times
Chau
1 year ago
User 3: I agree, it's a classic trick that never fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that's the best choice for tracking only associated clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
1 year ago
User 1: I always go with option A) Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ettie
1 year ago
Hold up, Locally Administered MAC Filtering? That's just gonna make things more complicated. Let's go with the option that actually makes sense - Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
Talia
1 year ago
Definitely, let's keep it simple and just focus on tracking associated clients for location analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 year ago
Yeah, we don't want to overcomplicate things. Duty Cycle Cutoff doesn't seem relevant either.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 year ago
I agree, Locally Administered MAC Filtering seems unnecessary. Exclude probing clients is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marleen
1 year ago
Duty Cycle Cutoff? Nah, that's not gonna help us track associated clients. We need to enable Location MAC Filtering for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Lacresha
1 year ago
B: Enable Location MAC Filtering
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 year ago
A: Duty Cycle Cutoff
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alonso
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure we need to exclude probing clients to track only associated clients. Seems like the obvious choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Donte
1 year ago
D: I agree, excluding probing clients is the way to go for CMX tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
C: Definitely, it's important to filter out probing clients for accurate data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorcas
1 year ago
B: Agreed, that would ensure we track only associated clients for location analytics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 year ago
A: I think we should go with option A) Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kati
1 year ago
But wouldn't enabling Location MAC Filtering help track only associated clients for location analytics?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Exclude probing clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
1 year ago
I think the answer is D) Enable Location MAC Filtering.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel