Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 15 Question 46 Discussion

A network engineer observes a spike in controller CPU overhead and overall network utilization after multicast is enabled on a controller with 500 APs. Which feature corrects the issue?
A) controller IGMP snooping and C) broadcast forwarding
B) multicast AP multicast mode
D) unicast AP multicast mode

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 15 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 46
Topic #: 15
[All 300-430 Questions]

A network engineer observes a spike in controller CPU overhead and overall network utilization after multicast is enabled on a controller with 500 APs. Which feature corrects the issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Ettie
9 months ago
Isn't broadcast forwarding still a thing? Sounds like a fix too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
10 months ago
Wow, I didn't realize multicast could cause such a spike!
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
10 months ago
Not sure about that, unicast AP multicast mode might be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
10 months ago
I think multicast AP multicast mode is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
10 months ago
Definitely IGMP snooping can help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
11 months ago
I vaguely remember that broadcast forwarding can cause issues, so it might not be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
11 months ago
I’m leaning towards unicast AP multicast mode, but I can't recall the exact details on how it reduces network utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
I think multicast AP multicast mode might help, but I feel like I saw a question similar to this where unicast was the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
11 months ago
I remember studying IGMP snooping, but I'm not entirely sure how it directly impacts CPU overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
11 months ago
I think the key here is identifying the situations where the auditor has no choice but to issue either an "except for" qualified opinion or an adverse opinion. The other options like a clean opinion or a disclaimer are not relevant for this question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
11 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a straightforward question about variable types. I'll need to carefully read through the options to determine which one is true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I ended up second-guessing myself on these percentages. Is it really just half the replacement value?
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about the details of the OMABAKUP macro. I'll need to review my notes to make sure I understand the different options and capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
11 months ago
My practice questions included airflow specs for Arista switches, but I feel like I'm mixing up the details between the 7150 and 7250 series.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
11 months ago
Okay, the question is asking about granting permissions to a user named DevUser. I'm pretty sure the correct answer is option B, GRANT VIEW DEFINITION TO DevUser, since that would allow the user to view the database definition and properties.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
1 year ago
IGMP snooping all the way! Gotta keep that multicast traffic under control or the network goes down faster than a bag of rocks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 year ago
D, unicast AP mode? Sounds like a one-way ticket to bandwidth hell. I'll take A and keep my sanity, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
1 year ago
C? Really? Broadcast forwarding? What is this, the 90s? Nah, I'm sticking with A.
upvoted 0 times
Salome
1 year ago
I agree, let's go with A) controller IGMP snooping to fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 year ago
B) multicast AP multicast mode might work too, but I'm leaning towards A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
1 year ago
A) controller IGMP snooping sounds like the best option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think multicast AP multicast mode could also potentially address the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 year ago
I agree with Adell, enabling controller IGMP snooping should help reduce the CPU overhead and network utilization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is A) controller IGMP snooping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think multicast AP multicast mode could also be a potential solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
1 year ago
Ooh, I'm going with B. Multicast AP mode should help offload the controller and keep those APs happy.
upvoted 0 times
Gabriele
1 year ago
Yeah, that should definitely help with the CPU overhead and network utilization. Let's give it a shot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asuncion
1 year ago
I think B is the way to go too. Let's try multicast AP mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glendora
1 year ago
I agree with Maricela, enabling IGMP snooping should help reduce the CPU overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
1 year ago
A, definitely. IGMP snooping is the way to go to control that multicast overhead. I'm not letting my network go down on my watch!
upvoted 0 times
Dean
1 year ago
No, that won't solve the issue. IGMP snooping is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 year ago
B) multicast AP multicast mode
upvoted 0 times
...
Vannessa
1 year ago
Yes, IGMP snooping will definitely help manage the multicast overhead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
1 year ago
A) controller IGMP snooping
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maricela
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) controller IGMP snooping.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel