Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 14 Question 68 Discussion

In a Cisco WLAN deployment, it is required that all Aps from branch1 remain operational even if the control plane CAPWAP tunnel is down because of a WAN failure to headquarters. Which operational mode must be configured on the APs?
C) lightweight
A) disconnected
B) standalone
D) connected

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 14 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 14
[All 300-430 Questions]

In a Cisco WLAN deployment, it is required that all Aps from branch1 remain operational even if the control plane CAPWAP tunnel is down because of a WAN failure to headquarters. Which operational mode must be configured on the APs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kimbery
9 months ago
Yeah, standalone keeps them operational during WAN failures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
9 months ago
Wait, are you sure? I thought disconnected was an option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
10 months ago
Standalone is the right choice here, no doubt!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
10 months ago
I thought lightweight would work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
10 months ago
Definitely needs to be standalone mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards "connected" because it sounds like the APs would still need to communicate, but that doesn't fit the WAN failure scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
11 months ago
I feel like "disconnected" could be the right choice, but I also recall some practice questions where "standalone" was mentioned in similar contexts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
11 months ago
I remember something about "lightweight" mode needing a controller, so that can't be right if the tunnel is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashonda
11 months ago
I think the answer might be "standalone" since it allows APs to operate independently, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The requirement to keep the APs operational even with a WAN failure is throwing me off. I'll need to review my notes on Cisco WLAN deployment modes to make the best guess here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
11 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of Cisco WLAN deployment. I'll carefully consider each option and try to eliminate the ones that don't fit the requirement. I'm leaning towards option B, but I want to double-check my reasoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olene
11 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The question is asking about the operational mode that needs to be configured on the APs to ensure they remain up even if the WAN connection to headquarters fails. I'm going to go with option B, standalone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about Cisco WLAN deployment. I'm pretty confident I know the answer, but I'll double-check the options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I need to make sure I understand the requirement that the APs remain operational even if the CAPWAP tunnel is down. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. I thought XSLT was more for bridging technology protocols, but I could be wrong. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cruz
1 year ago
Option B, standalone, for sure. Gotta keep those APs running, even if the control plane is taking a coffee break. Can't have the branch offices going dark, that's just bad for business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm hoping the answer isn't 'disconnect all the APs and send them on vacation until the WAN is back up.' That would be a bit extreme, even for a networking exam.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
1 year ago
C) lightweight
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 year ago
C) lightweight
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
1 year ago
B) standalone
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
1 year ago
A) disconnected
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
1 year ago
B) standalone
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
1 year ago
A) disconnected
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Svetlana
1 year ago
I'm going with B, standalone. Sounds like the APs need to be able to function independently, like little networking heroes saving the day when the WAN goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 year ago
Standalone mode, that's the one! This must be a common issue in Cisco WLAN deployments, so the engineers have probably got a good solution for it.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 year ago
B) standalone
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
1 year ago
A) disconnected
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
1 year ago
Hmm, the WAN failure scenario sounds like a tricky one. I'm thinking option B, standalone, might be the way to go since it allows the APs to keep operating even if the CAPWAP tunnel is down.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
1 year ago
True, standalone mode does offer more flexibility in case of a WAN failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
1 year ago
I think option B is still the better choice because standalone mode provides more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
1 year ago
But wouldn't option A, disconnected, also work since it allows the APs to operate independently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
1 year ago
I agree, option B, standalone, seems like the best choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think lightweight mode might also work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 year ago
I agree with Dominque, because standalone mode allows the APs to remain operational even if the control plane CAPWAP tunnel is down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
1 year ago
I think the answer is standalone.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel