Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 14 Question 36 Discussion

An engineer completes the setup of a wo-node Cisco ISE deployment for a guest portal. When testing the portal, the engineer notices that sometimesthere is a certificate CN mismatch. Which certificate type helps resolve this issue?
D) Self-Signed Wildcard
A) Public-Signed Root
B) Self-Signed Standard
C) Public-Signed SAN

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 14 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 14
[All 300-430 Questions]

An engineer completes the setup of a wo-node Cisco ISE deployment for a guest portal. When testing the portal, the engineer notices that sometimes

there is a certificate CN mismatch. Which certificate type helps resolve this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Gladys at Nov 21, 2022, 10:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Madelyn
10 months ago
Public-Signed Root is just too basic for modern setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
I thought wildcard certs were better for this kind of issue?
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
Wait, are we sure self-signed ones can’t work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 months ago
Totally agree, SAN certificates cover multiple domains!
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
11 months ago
Public-Signed SAN is the way to go for CN mismatches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between the types. I thought wildcard certificates were useful, but I’m not sure if they apply to this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think the SAN option is the one that allows multiple domain names. That might be the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
11 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like self-signed certificates could cause more issues than they solve. Maybe a public-signed one is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
11 months ago
I remember something about certificate CN mismatches being related to how the domain is validated. I think a SAN certificate might help with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
11 months ago
Data control seems like the most obvious answer here. Blockchain's distributed ledger and cryptographic security features give users more control over their data compared to traditional centralized systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
11 months ago
Wait, I'm a bit confused. Does the Key Flexfield appear as a single-space field enclosed in brackets? I'll need to double-check that detail before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the H.323 gateway component is used for interworking between different communication protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel