Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 14 Question 103 Discussion

A healthcare organization notices many rogue APs and is concerned about a honeypot attack. Which configuration must a wireless network engineer perform in Cisco Prime Infrastructure to prevent these attacks most efficiently upon detection?
D) Set the auto containment level to 4 and select the Using Our SSID containment option.
A) Set the auto containment level to 0 and select the Using Our SSID containment option.
B) Set the manual containment level to 4 and select the Ad Hoc Rogue AP containment option.
C) Set the auto containment level to 0 and select the Ad Hoc Rogue AP containment option.

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 14 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 14
[All 300-430 Questions]

A healthcare organization notices many rogue APs and is concerned about a honeypot attack. Which configuration must a wireless network engineer perform in Cisco Prime Infrastructure to prevent these attacks most efficiently upon detection?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

To prevent honeypot attacks most efficiently, the wireless network engineer should set the auto containment level to 4 and select the Using Our SSID containment option (D). This configuration allows the system to automatically contain rogue APs that are spoofing the organization's SSID, which is a common tactic in honeypot attacks.Reference: CCNP Enterprise Wireless Design ENWLSD 300-425 and Implementation ENWLSI 300-430 Official Cert Guide.


by Mariann at Jun 29, 2026, 11:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Quentin
3 days ago
I like option B. Manual control could prevent mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
8 days ago
I’m not sure about D. It seems too aggressive for initial detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
13 days ago
Option D could work too. Higher auto containment might be necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
19 days ago
I agree, but I’m leaning towards option A. Using our SSID feels safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
24 days ago
I think option C is the best choice. Ad Hoc containment seems effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
29 days ago
Definitely going with option C for a more proactive approach!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 month ago
Auto containment level 4? That's pretty high, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Johanna
1 month ago
Wait, are we sure about these containment levels? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blair
1 month ago
I disagree, I think option A is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
2 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice for containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
2 months ago
I vaguely remember that auto containment levels can be tricky; maybe setting it to 0 is a good way to start, but I’m unsure about the specific options to pair it with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like setting the manual containment level to 4 could be effective, but I’m not entirely confident about the ad hoc option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
2 months ago
I think the "Using Our SSID containment option" might be the safest choice, but I can't recall if it works better with auto or manual settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raymon
2 months ago
I remember studying rogue AP containment, but I'm not sure if the auto containment level should be set to 0 or 4 for the best results.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel