Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 10 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam

Question #: 55
Topic #: 10

An engineer has many different WLANs on a WLC but does not want to broadcast them to every AP in the building. Which group must be configured on the WLC to allow different WLANs on the different APs without creating new interfaces?

AACL

Binterface group

Cmobility group

DAP group

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, C

by Zona at Jan 24, 2024, 07:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Katy

9 months ago

Not sure about that, seems too easy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeff

9 months ago

Wait, can you really do that without new interfaces?

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

10 months ago

AP group is the way to go, no doubt!

upvoted 0 times

...

Barabara

10 months ago

I think it's interface group, not AP group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gracia

10 months ago

Definitely AP group!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yun

10 months ago

I’m a bit lost on this one. Mobility group sounds familiar, but I can’t recall how it relates to WLAN broadcasting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

11 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I believe it was about AP groups too. It seems like the most logical choice for controlling WLAN visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Selene

11 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about interface groups being related to WLANs. Could that be a possibility?

upvoted 0 times

...

Keshia

11 months ago

I think the answer might be AP group, since it allows you to manage which WLANs are broadcasted by specific APs without needing new interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawna

11 months ago

This is a good one. I think the key is understanding the difference between the various grouping options on the WLC. From what I recall, the AP group is the right choice here to selectively enable WLANs on specific APs. I'll double-check my notes to confirm, but I'm feeling confident about this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

11 months ago

I'm a little confused by the wording of this question. Does "not want to broadcast them to every AP" mean we need to limit the WLAN visibility? Or is it just about assigning different WLANs to different APs? I want to make sure I understand the requirement properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leanna

11 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The answer is AP group. That allows you to assign different WLANs to different APs without needing to create new interfaces on the WLC. Nice and simple!

upvoted 0 times

...

Novella

11 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we covered interface groups and mobility groups, but I can't quite remember the specific use case for each. I'll have to think this through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

11 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about WLAN configuration on a WLC. I think the key is understanding the different groups that can be used to segment the WLANs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anglea

11 months ago

Okay, I think I see it now. The administrator has the File Analytics bundle, but the inventory isn't showing the new version. The question is asking what additional file they need to transfer to the web server to make the inventory work. Based on the options, it looks like the Nutanix_compatibility_bundle.tar.gz is the file they need.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marg

11 months ago

Okay, let's see. Cloud Assembly is for provisioning and managing infrastructure, so that doesn't seem quite right. Service Broker sounds like the best fit for a common catalog that users can request items from. I'll go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaime

11 months ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. Assessing risk is all about analyzing the likelihood and impact of risks, so that's probably the answer that documents the risk characteristics.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theodora

11 months ago

Alright, time to put on my thinking cap. I recall that RDS supports notifications for backup, creation, and deletion events. So the one that's not supported must be restoration events. I'll go with that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valda

11 months ago

I think one advantage of the Umbrella branch package is that it prevents users from accessing malicious domains, but I'm not super confident about that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gabriele

1 year ago

AP group, no doubt. I'm just glad they didn't ask about mobility group - that's a whole other can of worms. Although, maybe I should start a mobility group for my pet hamsters. They're always on the move, you know.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenore

1 year ago

AP group, absolutely. I mean, who wants to deal with a bunch of new interfaces just to manage different WLANs? That's like trying to herd cats. AP group is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

Minna

1 year ago

I've never used AP group before, but it sounds like a much better solution than dealing with multiple interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evelynn

1 year ago

I agree, having to create new interfaces for each WLAN would be a nightmare. AP group is a lifesaver.

upvoted 0 times

...

Major

1 year ago

AP group is definitely the way to go. It makes managing different WLANs so much easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

1 year ago

I was a bit confused at first, but after thinking it through, AP group makes the most sense. It gives you the flexibility to manage different WLANs without creating new interfaces. Seems like a neat feature!

upvoted 0 times

Kiley

1 year ago

That's right, it's a convenient way to manage multiple WLANs on a WLC.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fernanda

1 year ago

Yes, AP group allows you to have different WLANs on different APs without creating new interfaces.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janae

1 year ago

I think the answer is D) AP group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherrell

1 year ago

Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question. AP group looks like the obvious choice here, since that allows you to group APs together and control which WLANs are broadcast on each group.

upvoted 0 times