Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

A Cisco CMX 3375 appliance on the 10.6.1 version code counts duplicate client entries, which creates wrong location analytics. The issue is primarily from iOS clients with the private MAC address feature enabled. Enabling this feature requires an upgrade of the Cisco CMX 3375 appliance in a high availability pair to version 10.6.3. SCP transfers the Cisco CMX image, but the upgrade script run fails. Which configuration change resolves this issue?
C) Break the high availability using the cmxha config disable command and upgrade the primary and secondary individuality.
A) Upgrade the high availability pair to version 10.6.2 image first and then upgrade to version 10.6.3.
B) Save configuration and use the upgrade script to upgrade the high availability pair without breaking the high availability.
D) Run root patch to first upgrade to version 10.6.2 and then migrate to version 10.6.3.

Cisco 300-430 Exam - Topic 1 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-430 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 1
[All 300-430 Questions]

A Cisco CMX 3375 appliance on the 10.6.1 version code counts duplicate client entries, which creates wrong location analytics. The issue is primarily from iOS clients with the private MAC address feature enabled. Enabling this feature requires an upgrade of the Cisco CMX 3375 appliance in a high availability pair to version 10.6.3. SCP transfers the Cisco CMX image, but the upgrade script run fails. Which configuration change resolves this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Melissia at May 30, 2024, 12:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-430 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lucina
9 months ago
Upgrading to 10.6.2 first is a solid move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tien
9 months ago
Definitely not B, that just complicates things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
10 months ago
Wait, does breaking high availability really work? Sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
10 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
10 months ago
iOS clients with private MACs really mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
10 months ago
I feel like option D is a bit risky, but I can't recall if running a root patch is necessary before upgrading.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to maintain high availability during upgrades, so option B sounds familiar.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think breaking high availability with option C might cause more issues than it solves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
11 months ago
I remember something about needing to upgrade to an intermediate version first, so maybe option A is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
11 months ago
Option C seems risky to me. Breaking the high availability and upgrading the primary and secondary individually could introduce a lot of potential issues. I'd try to avoid that if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
11 months ago
I'm not too familiar with Cisco CMX, so I'll need to review the details on high availability and the upgrade process more carefully. This seems like a tricky question that requires a good understanding of the Cisco CMX system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
11 months ago
Based on the options, it looks like Option B might be the best approach. Saving the configuration and using the upgrade script to upgrade the HA pair without breaking it seems like the most seamless solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the high availability aspect. Do we need to break the HA pair to upgrade, or is there a way to do it without disrupting the HA?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
11 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the key is to focus on the high availability configuration and how to properly upgrade the Cisco CMX appliance without breaking it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
11 months ago
I think MAC address filtering might be the way to go, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the most secure method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I'll read through the question carefully and think about the key devices mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
11 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea on this one. Data partitioning in the Cloud likely refers to how the cloud provider separates and manages data for different users or customers, to keep it secure and accessible. I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to double-check my understanding. From what I can tell, the correct answer is the one that describes business analysts creating web forms using BPM Process Composer, and then technical developers sometimes editing them. I'll review the other options to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
1 year ago
Hey, at least they're not asking us to upgrade to version 10.6.4 - that's when the real fun begins! Gotta love these Cisco upgrade questions, they're like a game of Tetris with networking equipment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 year ago
Ah, the good old root patch. Always a classic. But I think I'll pass on that one. I don't want to risk any unintended consequences. I'm gonna go with the 10.6.2 upgrade and then 10.6.3. Slow and steady wins the race, right?
upvoted 0 times
Mica
1 year ago
Taking it slow is definitely the way to go when it comes to upgrades like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
Yeah, I'd rather play it safe and go step by step with the upgrades.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
1 year ago
I think upgrading to 10.6.2 first is a good idea. It's better to be cautious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
1 year ago
I agree, the root patch can be risky. Slow and steady sounds like a safe approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
My
1 year ago
I'm just gonna go with option B. Save the config and let the upgrade script handle it. Seems like the safest bet, you know? I don't want to be the one to break the high availability and have to explain that to the team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jonell
1 year ago
Hmm, breaking the high availability pair doesn't sound like a good idea. I mean, I want to fix the issue, but I don't want to create a whole new set of problems. Let's try the 10.6.2 upgrade first and see if that does the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Johnetta
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. Let's try the safer option first before considering breaking the high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 year ago
A) Upgrade the high availability pair to version 10.6.2 image first and then upgrade to version 10.6.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
1 year ago
B) Save configuration and use the upgrade script to upgrade the high availability pair without breaking the high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
1 year ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one! I'm not sure if I should upgrade to 10.6.2 first or just go straight to 10.6.3. That upgrade script better not fail again, or I'm gonna be in trouble with the boss.
upvoted 0 times
Cheryl
1 year ago
C) Break the high availability using the cmxha config disable command and upgrade the primary and secondary individually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 year ago
B) Save configuration and use the upgrade script to upgrade the high availability pair without breaking the high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Royal
1 year ago
A) Upgrade the high availability pair to version 10.6.2 image first and then upgrade to version 10.6.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brock
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I'll have to reconsider my choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) Break the high availability using the cmxha config disable command and upgrade the primary and secondary individually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brock
1 year ago
I think the answer is A) Upgrade the high availability pair to version 10.6.2 image first and then upgrade to version 10.6.3.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel