Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-425 Exam - Topic 10 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-425 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 10
[All 300-425 Questions]

A new wireless network design has these requirements:

* AireOS WLCs as guest anchors

* a Cisco Catalyst 9800 Series WLC as the foreign controller

* use of Wi-Fi 6 APs

* inter-controller roaming for guest users

Which two design approaches meet these requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Andra at Oct 03, 2023, 11:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-425 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Rodolfo
4 months ago
Agreed, B and E are the best fit for this setup!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about B? I thought IRCM was outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
5 months ago
A seems off, E is the way to go for secure connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
5 months ago
I think D could work too, but not sure it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
5 months ago
Definitely B and E, those are solid choices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
5 months ago
I feel like using IPv6 could be beneficial, but I’m not convinced it’s a must-have for this design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where AVC was mentioned, but I don't see how it fits in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
6 months ago
I think secure mobility is definitely a requirement for pairing the controllers, but I can't recall if EoIP is necessary for communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
6 months ago
I remember something about using WLC software versions for inter-controller roaming, but I'm not sure if IRCM is the right term.
upvoted 0 times
...
Detra
6 months ago
The question is pretty clear, but I'd want to make sure I understand the implications of each design approach before selecting the final two. Gotta be careful not to miss any gotchas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about using EoIP for communication between controllers. That doesn't seem to align with the stated requirements. I'd double-check the options and go with the most relevant ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
6 months ago
Based on the requirements, I'd say options B and E are the way to go. Using WLC software versions that support IRCM and secure mobility to pair the controllers should meet the needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the inter-controller roaming for guest users requirement. Not sure how that impacts the design approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
6 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question on wireless network design. I'd focus on the key requirements like the use of AireOS WLCs, Catalyst 9800 Series WLC, and Wi-Fi 6 APs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
6 months ago
This question seems straightforward, I'll review the options carefully and choose the one that doesn't match the valid states.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
6 months ago
This looks like a classic decision tree problem. I'll need to carefully calculate the expected values for each project to determine the risk-averse option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
6 months ago
Okay, this seems straightforward. I'll just need to click on the chart and then apply Style 7.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
6 months ago
I think the key is to focus on the capabilities that the cloud environment provides for machine learning, like scalability and managed services. The question is asking what's true about that, so I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
6 months ago
Traffic policing is used to enforce bandwidth limits, not prioritize traffic. Round-robin scheduling treats all traffic equally, so that's not the right choice either. I'm leaning towards expedited forwarding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
11 months ago
Hmm, this sounds like a trick question. I bet the answer is something like 'use a Ouija board to communicate between the controllers.'
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
9 months ago
A: Yeah, those two options seem to meet all the requirements for the wireless network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
9 months ago
B: I agree, and I also think E) Use secure mobility to pair controllers is another correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delbert
10 months ago
A: I think the answer is B) Use WLC software versions that support IRCM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
11 months ago
D? Really? IPv6 for a wireless network? That's like putting a Ferrari engine in a bicycle. Gotta be B and E.
upvoted 0 times
Francoise
10 months ago
D? Come on, IPv6 is the future! It's not like a Ferrari engine in a bicycle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
10 months ago
E) Use secure mobility to pair controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
11 months ago
B) Use WLC software versions that support IRCM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jestine
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the mention of guest anchors and foreign controllers. Isn't that more related to Mobility Express? I'll go with B and E just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Laurena
9 months ago
That sounds like a good plan, covering both software versions and secure mobility for controller pairing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
9 months ago
I'll go with B and E as well, just to be safe and cover all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
10 months ago
I agree, it seems like a more advanced setup with specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vince
11 months ago
I think the mention of guest anchors and foreign controllers is related to the overall wireless network design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Samira
12 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we should also consider using secure mobility to pair controllers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
12 months ago
I agree with you, that seems like a good approach for the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
12 months ago
B and E seem like the obvious choices here. IRCM and secure mobility are key for this wireless network design.
upvoted 0 times
Jean
10 months ago
Yes, those two options will ensure a smooth and secure wireless network with inter-controller roaming for guest users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
11 months ago
I agree, using IRCM and secure mobility will definitely meet the requirements for this design.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elli
12 months ago
I think we should use WLC software versions that support IRCM.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel