MENU
An architect is designing a network solution for a customer The network is IPv6-only with 1000 hosts. The design must provide external access to up to 10 concurrent IPv6 hosts to allow communication with legacy IPv4 devices on an adjacent network. The customer set aside 10 IPv4 addresses to allow for one-to-one communication between hosts. Which solution must the architect select?
Suggested Answer: A
Get Premium 300-420 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
MA
Markus
10 months ago
Surprised they need 10 concurrent IPv6 hosts for just 10 IPv4 addresses!
JO
Jodi
10 months ago
I thought dynamic NAT-PT was the best choice here?
CR
Cristal
10 months ago
Wait, isn't static NAT-PT outdated?
KA
Kathrine
11 months ago
Totally agree, NAT64 is the way to handle that!
TW
Twana
11 months ago
Gotta go with stateful NAT64 for this one.
LA
Laurel
11 months ago
I feel like dynamic NAT-PT could work, but I’m not confident it’s the best fit for IPv6-only networks.
KI
Kirk
11 months ago
Dynamic NPTv6 sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it supports the external access needed for those 10 concurrent hosts.
NO
Nobuko
11 months ago
I think static NAT-PT might be the answer since it allows for one-to-one mapping, but I need to double-check the requirements.
BO
Bobbye
12 months ago
I remember studying NAT64, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right choice for this scenario.
RE
Remedios
12 months ago
Stateful NAT64 is the way to go. It allows the IPv6 hosts to communicate with the IPv4 devices while efficiently translating the addresses.
AL
Alise
1 year ago
I'm not too familiar with some of these IPv6 transition technologies. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between NAT-PT, NPTv6, and NAT64 before deciding.
LA
Laurena
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is providing external access to the IPv6 hosts while allowing communication with the legacy IPv4 devices. Stateful NAT64 seems like the right choice here.
JO
Joesph
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the IPv4 and IPv6 requirements. I'll need to review my notes on transitioning between the two protocols.
GE
German
1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the requirements carefully to determine the best solution.
GE
Genevive
2 years ago
You know, if I were the architect, I'd be tempted to suggest a carrier-grade NAT solution just to see the customer's reaction. But that's probably not the best idea for this scenario.
JU
Judy
1 year ago
C) dynamic NPTv6
FL
Flo
1 year ago
A) stateful NAT64
RU
Rutha
2 years ago
I see your point, Rex, but I still think stateful NAT64 is the most suitable option for this specific requirement.
SH
Shala
2 years ago
Ha! I bet the architect is wishing they had a crystal ball to see the future network needs. Better play it safe and go with the classic stateful NAT64.
JU
Justine
1 year ago
A) stateful NAT64
GI
Gilberto
1 year ago
I think dynamic NPTv6 could also work well in this situation.
TA
Tamra
1 year ago
C) dynamic NPTv6
QU
Queen
1 year ago
I agree, stateful NAT64 seems like the safest bet for this scenario.
JU
Juliana
2 years ago
A) stateful NAT64
MI
Mickie
2 years ago
I don't know, guys. Dynamic NAT-PT could give the customer more flexibility if they need to expand the network in the future. But I'm not sure if it's the best fit for this specific requirement.
LA
Latanya
1 year ago
I agree, dynamic NAT-PT could offer more flexibility for future network expansion.
DE
Devorah
1 year ago
C) dynamic NPTv6 might be a better choice to allow communication with legacy IPv4 devices.
MA
Marci
2 years ago
A) stateful NAT64 could be a good option for providing external access to IPv4 hosts.
RE
Rex
2 years ago
I believe dynamic NPTv6 could also work, as it allows for prefix translation without changing the addresses.
JI
Jill
2 years ago
I agree with Magnolia, stateful NAT64 seems like the best solution for this scenario.
MA
Magnolia
2 years ago
I think the architect should select stateful NAT64.
DA
Dana
2 years ago
Dynamic NPTv6 could work too, but it might be overkill for this scenario. The customer wants a simple one-to-one mapping, so static NAT-PT might be the most efficient choice.
HE
Hermila
2 years ago
Hmm, I think option A is the way to go. Stateful NAT64 seems like the most straightforward solution to connect the IPv6 hosts with the legacy IPv4 devices.
AU
Audra
2 years ago
Yes, stateful NAT64 will ensure smooth communication between the two networks.
HE
Heike
2 years ago
I agree, it provides a seamless way to connect the IPv6 hosts with the legacy IPv4 devices.
EU
Eun
2 years ago
A) stateful NAT64 is definitely the best choice for this scenario.