Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 7 Question 113 Discussion

Company A recently acquired another company. Users of the newly acquired company must be able to access a server that exists on Company A's network, both companies use overlapping IP address ranges. Which action conserves IP address space and provides access to the server?
A) Use a single IP address to create overload NAT
B) Use a single IP address to create a static NAT entry
C) Build one-to-one NAT translation for every user that needs access
D) Re-IP overlapping address space in the acquired company

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 7 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 7
[All 300-420 Questions]

Company A recently acquired another company. Users of the newly acquired company must be able to access a server that exists on Company A's network, both companies use overlapping IP address ranges. Which action conserves IP address space and provides access to the server?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Candida at Jul 04, 2025, 11:19 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Lisha
8 months ago
Definitely not a fan of that approach, too many issues with overlapping!
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
9 months ago
Static NAT? Seems like a waste of IPs to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
9 months ago
I think re-IPing is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
9 months ago
Overload NAT is a good way to conserve IP space!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
9 months ago
Surprised no one mentioned the complexity of one-to-one NAT!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
9 months ago
Building one-to-one NAT for every user sounds like overkill and would waste IPs. I think overload NAT is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where re-IPing was the answer, but it seems like a hassle. I wonder if there’s a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like static NAT could work too. It just seems like it might not save as much space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
10 months ago
I remember studying NAT configurations, and I think overload NAT might be the best option here since it conserves IP space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Using a single IP address for overload NAT seems like the best way to conserve addresses and still grant access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
11 months ago
Re-IPing the acquired company's network? That seems like a lot of work. I bet there's a more efficient solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
11 months ago
Okay, the key here is conserving IP address space while providing access. I think option A or B is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the differences between static and overload NAT. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
11 months ago
This seems like a classic NAT question. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
1 year ago
I think we should consider option D to avoid any conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
1 year ago
Wait, we have to re-IP the whole acquired company? That's a lot of work! I'm sticking with option D, just to avoid the headache.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
11 months ago
Yeah, option D does seem like the most straightforward way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
1 year ago
I think using a single IP address for static NAT entry could be a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
1 year ago
I agree, re-IPing the whole company sounds like a huge task.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tina
1 year ago
Hmm, a static NAT entry, eh? Sounds like a good way to keep things simple and organized. I'm voting for option B!
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
1 year ago
Ooh, I'm feeling like a NAT wizard today! Let's go with option A - overload NAT. It's like a one-stop-shop for all our IP needs.
upvoted 0 times
Lettie
1 year ago
User 3: Overload NAT does sound like the way to go. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, it's a great solution for conserving IP address space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johna
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A - overload NAT. It's efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiera
1 year ago
I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel