Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 6 Question 128 Discussion

An engineer must configure EIGRP to ensure that all WAN routes are not advertised to the routers in a data center. Which action must be taken?
A) Configure the stub router in receive-only mode.
B) Advertise only the default route.
C) Summarize the local subnets.
D) Configure the stub router in distributed mode.

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 6 Question 128 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam
Question #: 128
Topic #: 6
[All 300-420 Questions]

An engineer must configure EIGRP to ensure that all WAN routes are not advertised to the routers in a data center. Which action must be taken?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The action is to configure the EIGRP stub router in receive-only mode. Cisco EIGRP stub routing limits which routes a router advertises to neighbors, reducing query scope and improving stability in hub-and-spoke or WAN designs. The receive-only keyword is the most restrictive stub option: the router receives routes from neighbors but does not advertise any routes to them. That directly satisfies the requirement that WAN routes must not be advertised to the routers in the data center. Advertising only a default route still advertises routing information, so it does not meet the wording. Summarizing local subnets reduces the number of routes, but it still advertises reachability. The ''distributed mode'' option is not the correct EIGRP stub behavior for this requirement; redistributed stub mode would allow redistributed routes to be advertised. Receive-only is therefore the precise design control for stopping route advertisement from the stub router. Reference topics: EIGRP stub routing, receive-only mode, query scoping, route advertisement control, WAN-to-data-center design.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Iraida
13 days ago
C could work too. Summarizing local subnets might help manage routes better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sueann
18 days ago
I’m leaning towards B. Advertising only the default route seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
24 days ago
I think option A is the best choice. It keeps the WAN routes hidden.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
29 days ago
D) sounds like overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
1 month ago
Wait, I thought stub routers only worked in receive-only mode?
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 month ago
C) could help, but it doesn't fully address the WAN routes issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amalia
1 month ago
I disagree, B) seems more effective for controlling route advertisement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
2 months ago
A) is the right choice for a stub router.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
2 months ago
I thought advertising only the default route was a common solution, but I’m not confident it would prevent WAN routes from being advertised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
2 months ago
I feel like configuring the stub router in distributed mode could be a possibility, but I need to double-check what that actually does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
2 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we had to limit route advertisements, but I can't recall if summarizing subnets is the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
2 months ago
I think the answer might be A, but I'm not entirely sure how receive-only mode works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel