Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 6 Question 105 Discussion

Posted by Janet on Jan 10, 2025 at 10:32 AM

An architect must develop a campus network solution that includes:

logically segmented and isolated networks

ability to communicate between network segments when required

support for overlapping IP addresses

widely available technologies to avoid purchasing specialized equipment

Which solution must the architect select?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
35 comments · newest first
CA
Candra 11 months ago
802.1Q with HSRP is outdated, I wouldn't go for that.
CO
Cordelia 11 months ago
Wait, can you really use overlapping IPs with these options?
CH
Christiane 11 months ago
Overlapping IPs? That's tricky, but VRF-Lite handles it.
AD
Adaline 11 months ago
I think vPC with HSRP could work too, but not as well.
DE
Delisa 12 months ago
VRF-Lite with OSPF is a solid choice for segmentation.
VA
Valentin 12 months ago
I feel like VSS with IGP could work for segmenting networks, but I’m uncertain about its support for overlapping IP addresses.
LO
Lorrie 1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where vPC was mentioned, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses the need for isolated networks.
EM
Emiko 1 year ago
I think 802.1Q with HSRP might be a good option since it supports VLANs and redundancy, but I'm not completely confident about the isolation part.
DE
Delbert 1 year ago
I remember studying about VRF-Lite and how it can help with overlapping IP addresses, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice here.
CA
Casey 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that VRF-Lite with OSPF is the way to go here. It meets all the requirements and is a widely used solution.
KI
King 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the "widely available technologies" requirement. Does that mean we can't use specialized equipment? That might rule out some of the more complex options.
LE
Leslee 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is finding the solution that provides logical segmentation and isolation, while still allowing communication between segments.
SH
Shawnda 1 year ago
Hmm, the ability to support overlapping IP addresses is an interesting requirement. I'll have to think through how each solution handles that.
BO
Bonita 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and compare the options.
LA
Lauran 1 year ago
I heard the architect is also looking for a solution that can make the network administrator do a happy dance. Maybe they should try the 'Virtualized Shuffle' with a side of 'Hyper-Converged Hustle'.
AM
Ammie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lauran
A: Definitely, it's the best choice for logically segmented and isolated networks with support for overlapping IP addresses.
RO
Rolande 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lauran
B: Yeah, that solution would meet all the requirements and make the network administrator do a happy dance.
TO
Tomas 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lauran
A: I think the architect should go with option D, VRF-Lite with OSPF.
VE
Verlene 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is making my head spin like a VSS on a treadmill. Time to grab another cup of coffee and really think this through.
LA
Laticia 1 year ago
C is the way to go! vPC with HSRP will give you the logical segmentation, communication between segments, and widely available technologies. Plus, who doesn't love a good 'virtual PortChannel'?
NI
Nilsa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laticia
A: Definitely, vPC with HSRP provides the necessary features without the need for specialized equipment.
JO
Joni 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laticia
B: Agreed, VRF-Lite with OSPF might be a good choice as well, but vPC with HSRP seems more suitable.
LA
Laura 1 year ago
↳ replying to Laticia
A: I think C is the best option too. vPC with HSRP covers all the requirements.
CA
Cammy 1 year ago
I'm torn between B and D. 802.1Q with HSRP and VRF-Lite with OSPF both seem viable, but I'm leaning towards D since it supports overlapping IP addresses.
EL
Elliot 2 years ago
I think D is the best option. VRF-Lite with OSPF seems like the perfect solution to meet all the requirements.
RU
Rupert 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
I think D) VRF-Lite with OSPF is the most suitable choice for this situation.
LE
Leigha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
D) VRF-Lite with OSPF provides the necessary features for a campus network solution.
JU
Jutta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
I agree, D) VRF-Lite with OSPF is the best option for this scenario.
DO
Dorinda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
D) VRF-Lite with OSPF
LA
Lashonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
C) vPC with HSRP
LA
Lashonda 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
B) 802.1Q with HSRP
SH
Sherill 1 year ago
↳ replying to Elliot
A) VSS with IGP
MA
Mammie 2 years ago
But what about option A) VSS with IGP? It also supports communication between network segments when required.
RA
Raelene 2 years ago
I agree with Gwenn. VRF-Lite with OSPF can provide logically segmented and isolated networks.
GW
Gwenn 2 years ago
I think the architect should select option D) VRF-Lite with OSPF.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel