Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 6 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 300-420 exam

Question #: 105
Topic #: 6

[All 300-420 Questions]

An architect must develop a campus network solution that includes:

logically segmented and isolated networks

ability to communicate between network segments when required

support for overlapping IP addresses

widely available technologies to avoid purchasing specialized equipment

Which solution must the architect select?

AVSS with IGP

B802.1Q with HSRP

CvPC with HSRP

DVRF-Lite with OSPF

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Janet at Jan 10, 2025, 10:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Candra

9 months ago

802.1Q with HSRP is outdated, I wouldn't go for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cordelia

9 months ago

Wait, can you really use overlapping IPs with these options?

upvoted 0 times

...

Christiane

10 months ago

Overlapping IPs? That's tricky, but VRF-Lite handles it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adaline

10 months ago

I think vPC with HSRP could work too, but not as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

10 months ago

VRF-Lite with OSPF is a solid choice for segmentation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

10 months ago

I feel like VSS with IGP could work for segmenting networks, but I’m uncertain about its support for overlapping IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

11 months ago

I practiced a similar question where vPC was mentioned, but I can't recall if it specifically addresses the need for isolated networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emiko

11 months ago

I think 802.1Q with HSRP might be a good option since it supports VLANs and redundancy, but I'm not completely confident about the isolation part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delbert

11 months ago

I remember studying about VRF-Lite and how it can help with overlapping IP addresses, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

11 months ago

I'm pretty confident that VRF-Lite with OSPF is the way to go here. It meets all the requirements and is a widely used solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

King

11 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the "widely available technologies" requirement. Does that mean we can't use specialized equipment? That might rule out some of the more complex options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leslee

11 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key is finding the solution that provides logical segmentation and isolation, while still allowing communication between segments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawnda

11 months ago

Hmm, the ability to support overlapping IP addresses is an interesting requirement. I'll have to think through how each solution handles that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bonita

11 months ago

This looks like a tricky question. I'll need to carefully consider the requirements and compare the options.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

1 year ago

I heard the architect is also looking for a solution that can make the network administrator do a happy dance. Maybe they should try the 'Virtualized Shuffle' with a side of 'Hyper-Converged Hustle'.

upvoted 0 times

Ammie

1 year ago

A: Definitely, it's the best choice for logically segmented and isolated networks with support for overlapping IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rolande

1 year ago

B: Yeah, that solution would meet all the requirements and make the network administrator do a happy dance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

1 year ago

A: I think the architect should go with option D, VRF-Lite with OSPF.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verlene

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. This question is making my head spin like a VSS on a treadmill. Time to grab another cup of coffee and really think this through.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laticia

1 year ago

C is the way to go! vPC with HSRP will give you the logical segmentation, communication between segments, and widely available technologies. Plus, who doesn't love a good 'virtual PortChannel'?

upvoted 0 times

Nilsa

1 year ago

A: Definitely, vPC with HSRP provides the necessary features without the need for specialized equipment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

1 year ago

B: Agreed, VRF-Lite with OSPF might be a good choice as well, but vPC with HSRP seems more suitable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laura

1 year ago

A: I think C is the best option too. vPC with HSRP covers all the requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cammy

1 year ago

I'm torn between B and D. 802.1Q with HSRP and VRF-Lite with OSPF both seem viable, but I'm leaning towards D since it supports overlapping IP addresses.

upvoted 0 times

...