Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Cisco 300-420 Exam - Topic 5 Question 127 Discussion

Posted by Tamekia on May 29, 2026 at 12:02 AM

An engineer is designing a QoS solution for a customer The customer's internet connection has a bandwidth of 10 Mbps. The design must ensure that traffic bursts of data do not exceed the bandwidth of the connection and that received traffic does not starve out business-critical traffic Which solution must the engineer choose?

Suggested Answer: C

The correct QoS design is to shape outbound traffic and police inbound traffic. Traffic shaping buffers and schedules outbound packets so the customer does not send bursts beyond the 10 Mbps Internet connection rate. This is useful on egress because the local router controls the transmit queue and can smooth bursts before they reach the provider. Cisco QoS design distinguishes shaping from policing: shaping delays excess traffic, while policing drops or remarks excess traffic immediately. Inbound shaping is generally not effective because the traffic has already arrived on the interface; the device cannot delay packets before they consume the inbound circuit. Inbound policing can protect business-critical traffic by limiting or dropping lower-priority excess traffic as it enters the network. Policing outbound would enforce the rate but would cause avoidable drops during bursts, which is less desirable when the router can shape before transmission. Therefore, outbound shaping and inbound policing satisfy both rate-control and protection requirements. Reference topics: traffic shaping, traffic policing, QoS queuing, Internet edge QoS, congestion management.


Get Premium 300-420 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
15 comments · newest first
JU
Judy 1 month ago
Exactly! A prevents data bursts from causing issues.
RO
Roxane 2 months ago
I feel A ensures critical traffic isn't affected.
RI
Rima 2 months ago
True, but we can't ignore inbound traffic. A is safer.
LE
Lezlie 2 months ago
Option C could work too, but it focuses more on outbound.
AL
Allene 2 months ago
I agree, A makes sense. We need to manage both directions.
LI
Lili 2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It balances inbound and outbound traffic.
LA
Lashawn 2 months ago
Not sure if this will really prevent traffic starvation...
SH
Shelia 3 months ago
Totally agree with C, it balances everything right!
JE
Jesusita 3 months ago
Wait, shaping outbound? Isn't that risky?
CO
Corrinne 3 months ago
I think A makes more sense, though.
DA
Daron 3 months ago
Gotta go with option C for sure!
BU
Burma 3 months ago
If I recall correctly, shaping outbound and policing inbound could help manage bursts effectively. I think that might be option C.
ST
Stefan 3 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the difference between shaping and policing in this context. Does it matter if we shape inbound or outbound traffic?
MA
Ma 4 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we had to prioritize business-critical traffic. I feel like outbound shaping might be the right choice here.
VI
Vicente 4 months ago
I remember we discussed how shaping and policing work, but I'm not sure if we should focus on inbound or outbound for this scenario.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel